I know it's something that the FM's have been discussing for years, now I have found a useful interactive graphic to show everyone.
http://visualization.geblogs.c...n/co2/#/club_penguin
I know it's something that the FM's have been discussing for years, now I have found a useful interactive graphic to show everyone.
http://visualization.geblogs.c...n/co2/#/club_penguin
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I can't see it on my iPad, I'll go fire up my ancient laptop.
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
I agree El, I can't see how those figures are correct.
How was this info arrived at EC? Are you spying on Penguins now
How was this info arrived at EC? Are you spying on Penguins now
Not me personally, I have a couple of polar bears fro that job
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
I agree El, I can't see how those figures are correct.
It has to be right doesn't it?
After all I got it from the Interweb
How was this info arrived at EC? Are you spying on Penguins now
Not me personally, I have a couple of polar bears fro that job
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
I agree El, I can't see how those figures are correct.
It has to be right doesn't it?
After all I got it from the Interweb
How rude!!!! I don't produce any CO2
*parp*
How rude!!!! I don't produce any CO2
*parp*
ROFL!
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
I agree El, I can't see how those figures are correct.
It has to be right doesn't it?
After all I got it from the Interweb
It's all that fish!
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
I agree El, I can't see how those figures are correct.
It has to be right doesn't it?
After all I got it from the Interweb
It's all that fish!
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
They're not talking about the animal penguins!
They're talking about Club Penguin - it's an online game run by Disney!
(This might make it clearer: http://visualization.geblogs.c...n/co2/#/data_centres)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Penguin
BTW: their use of units is a bit inconsistent. They give the output of EyjafjallajÃķkull (which they also misspell ) as 150,000t but the output of Yellowstone is given as 173kt. It means it can be easy to miscompare things if you're not paying attention...
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
They're not talking about the animal penguins!
They're talking about Club Penguin - it's an online game run by Disney!
(This might make it clearer: http://visualization.geblogs.c...n/co2/#/data_centres)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Penguin
BTW: their use of units is a bit inconsistent. They give the output of EyjafjallajÃķkull (which they also misspell ) as 150,000t but the output of Yellowstone is given as 173kt. It means it can be easy to miscompare things if you're not paying attention...
Thanks for clarifying things, Eugene.
So a penguin generates 136,000 tons of CO2
but:
http://visualization.geblogs.c...tion/co2/#/person_uk
a person in the UK 15 tons
There's something seriously wrong with those values
They're not talking about the animal penguins!
They're talking about Club Penguin - it's an online game run by Disney!
(This might make it clearer: http://visualization.geblogs.c...n/co2/#/data_centres)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Penguin
BTW: their use of units is a bit inconsistent. They give the output of EyjafjallajÃķkull (which they also misspell ) as 150,000t but the output of Yellowstone is given as 173kt. It means it can be easy to miscompare things if you're not paying attention...
Thanks for explaining that. I've never heard of the Club Penguin game.
Access to this requires a premium membership.
Upgrade to VIP premium membership for just $25/year to unlock these benefits:
Ad-Free | Search Site | Start Dialogs |
Upload Photos | Upload Videos | Upload Audio |
Upload Documents | Use Signature | Block Members |
View Member Directory | Mark All Topics As Read | Edit Posts Anytime |
Post To Walls |