Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Saint:

Loved Deana - always got a rough deal but rose above the haters with elegance

I thought Deana was great too. However much as it pains me to say it, I think she was ill-advised to sue for libel. Even the judge agreed that Connor's attacks were "vile abuse", but it's difficult to see how they could be construed as defamatory...

Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Loved Deana - always got a rough deal but rose above the haters with elegance

I thought Deana was great too. However much as it pains me to say it, I think she was ill-advised to sue for libel. Even the judge agreed that Connor's attacks were "vile abuse", but it's difficult to see how they could be construed as defamatory...

I agree.  Perhaps threatening and intimidating behaviour etc might have been a better angle?

 

Cosmopolitan
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Loved Deana - always got a rough deal but rose above the haters with elegance

I thought Deana was great too. However much as it pains me to say it, I think she was ill-advised to sue for libel. Even the judge agreed that Connor's attacks were "vile abuse", but it's difficult to see how they could be construed as defamatory...

So do I.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Cosmopolitan:
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Loved Deana - always got a rough deal but rose above the haters with elegance

I thought Deana was great too. However much as it pains me to say it, I think she was ill-advised to sue for libel. Even the judge agreed that Connor's attacks were "vile abuse", but it's difficult to see how they could be construed as defamatory...

I agree.  Perhaps threatening and intimidating behaviour etc might have been a better angle?

 

Yeah... how come people get arrested for abusing someone on twitter, and Conor got away with that?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×