Lab, Lib, Con, DC Thomson?
See that spanner from The Spectator can't afford any legitimate advertising.
Lab, Lib, Con, DC Thomson?
See that spanner from The Spectator can't afford any legitimate advertising.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Rupes, obviously.
They're a bunch of shits.
I'm voting with my finger right on the pulse this time.
Motherwell Monster Ravin' Bam
I don't care if he's on methadone.
What are we talking about?
Edit: If it's the Pope, I'm very disappointed already.
The newspaper regulation thing....I think.
Make it up as you go along col
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
But only if it's true
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
But only if it's true
this ^^^^^
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
But only if it's true
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
*Conkers*
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
Exactly
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
exactly....tell Liverpool they should have free rein
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
exactly....tell Liverpool they should have free rein
Access to this requires a premium membership.
Upgrade to VIP premium membership for just $25/year to unlock these benefits:
Ad-Free | Search Site | Start Dialogs |
Upload Photos | Upload Videos | Upload Audio |
Upload Documents | Use Signature | Block Members |
View Member Directory | Mark All Topics As Read | Edit Posts Anytime |
Post To Walls |