Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by Carnelian:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
And now Labour will treat the Osbourn train ticket thing being like the Great Train Robbery, and old Dick - Ed will be hunting him down and ruining next weeks PMQ's., instead of talking about the real and important issues that face real people.
Oh come on videostar, that's a bit rich! We've had at least three years of Coalition politicians commencing every reply with "the mess the last lot left" or quoting Chris Bryant's moronic "There's no money left" note, as if the global credit crunch was Gordon Brown's doing!
Labour were far from perfect in office and did make some costly errors of judgement but they didn't create the global credit crunch.
But the Tories weren't trying to get Labour MP's sacked.
Oh, I think they did when the opportunity arose.
Personally, I regard Andrew Mitchell as a bit unfortunate. I think he just lost his cool and was stating what many of his party probably think in private and THAT is his undoing. It might even be less than that, as many use 'pleb' as a substitute for 'chav'. However, the Tories under Dave, Gideon and Bozo have to be seen not to be a party of the establishment elite looking down their noses at the 'plebs', so for that reason he had to go. You can blame the Tories as much as Labour for that one!
It wouldn't have mattered under Thatcher's gov't as her lot had grammar school middle class credentials. Having said that, Thatcher would have dumped him in a heart beat.
I don't think his actions merit his resignation against a backdrop of widespread MP corruption over expenses. Ed's calls for his sacking were opportunistic, but Ed has to play the game and score the points. It all adds to a chipping away of the government's credibility. You can't shout 'foul' over something the Tories would have done had the positions been reversed.