Its a vote to save ,so yes.

I remember Davina just after an eviction shoe saying "Do you want another one out " and the lines reopened.

i wouldn't object.

Can't see why they would tbh - vote to save so surely the two with the lowest votes would go?

*dreams of conor skipping down the stairs with Caroline*

So if "the right 2" (Lushleigh) are bottom of the voting - we get a double?

As long as Adam's not involved they can kick out as many as they like for me.    Might kinda spoil the rest of the run though.    I don't think they'll make a spur of the moment decision though  Unfortunately.

Surely it becomes a matter of ethics at some point, though?

I've not voted this week btw

not sure what you mean?    I've not voted either btw.  

The not being specific beforehand regarding what will happen and having the right to ultimately decide how many go.

Gotcha.   I still don't see the problem tbh - if you're voting for your favourite would it change how you voted if you thought the two least popular would go? Unless you were going to vote some more to try to make sure they were at the top of the list instead of maybe somewhere near the middle I suppose

I suppose I’m thinking that I maybe wouldn’t want to spend money if I didn’t know exactly what I was saving my favourite from.

Regardless - i am hoping more than one is evicted!

Just an out there question but does Ch5 make more money out of vote to save than Ch4 did for vote to evict?  Just curious because everything about Ch5 smacks of money grabbing 

Some definitely would, but the important point is that C5 would be in breach of Ofcom rules if they tried it.

Ofcom tightened-up the rules a few years back, and broadcasters must announce the exact nature of the voting before the lines open - and then stick to it.

I'm not 100% certain about midweek evictions during the final vote-to-win, but from memory, BB has only once changed a standard eviction after voting started: that was in BB7 the week that Mikey and Susie went in a double. When nominations were announced at the end of the evening's HL show, it appeared to be a normal (single) eviction, but the next day the ads had been changed to state it was a double eviction. No reason or even acknowledgement was given, and it's possible that they forgot to announce a double from the start, but it looked suspiciously as if BB changed their minds because they realized Susie wouldn't go in a single eviction. Either way, C4 got into a lot of trouble over that (although it was all rather overshadowed by the "returning HMs" fiasco).

Bottom line: if this Friday's eviction is suddenly changed into a double (or more), C5 will be reported to Ofcom. Whether C5 (i.e. Richard Desmond) actually cares about that is another question entirely...

Ch5 have stated that the lines are open to vote and save your fav HM .When the eviction is over Ch5 can announce another eviction is going to take place the lines will be re opend to vote and Save your fav HM.

Just get the conveyor belt up and running  

Toaster, a Conor, a teasmaid, a Caroline, a £50 voucher for Greggs, a Becky, cuddly toy,

a fortnight in Skegness, an Ashleigh.....

Yup, but it'll be interesting to see how that pans out with most of the population watching the Olympics Opening Ceremony on the Beeb at the time. I still feel an Ofcom investigation coming on...

Good game, good game .

Hi erin   

Evening col  

Hope the cats are still roaming free  

Yes, but I'm really worried now when they don't come in regularly. The village jungle drum has spoken and identified him, so my daughter will have a word with him next time she comes over. She's very diplomatic and gorgeous, so he will probably turn into ma wee pussycats.

I like the sound of your daughter  

Even delivery - don't miss him and hit the wall  

dreams with Kaffy  - dream eviction

Confirmed on BotS: No double eviction tomorrow.

Strong suggestions that there will be at least one before the end of the series, though...

Gutted.