Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Syd:
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Tina:
Originally Posted by nuts:
Originally Posted by Baz:

Well I am going to buck the trend.... again... I liked her

*Sits with Baz* 


im with these 2

Me too. I like common. I like normal ......................the twins are from a different world (and shagged out ole prossies to boot).

 

That's my take on it TBH ......they may have shoes that cost thousands of pounds and Natalies are from Dorothy Perkins ............that's not anything to do with jealousy - that's real!

And there Natalie did her epic fail..she was bragging in the week she did'nt have to worry about anything..just says, "yes I'll have it"..she has everything..she goes to Waterstones and buys hundreds of pounds worth of books she does'nt read..she's got clothes she'll never wear..she buys ÂĢ40 worth of fresh flowers a week for her house..she's a hypocrit....

I think she was "Knocking" herself for her spending habits, not congratulating herself stonks.

I disagree Syd..everything thats come out of her mouth has been a passive aggresive comment, they always have 2 meanings..eg..Michael is so annoying but I love him..the twins are over confidents but I like that..I could go on and I'm not the only person to see this side in her cos thats why she's out..She only had to say she over spent, she did'nt have to say what she spent her money on or that she never had to worry about money and if I was on the twins income I would'nt be buying shit shoes either....

stonks
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by Syd:
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Tina:
Originally Posted by nuts:
Originally Posted by Baz:

Well I am going to buck the trend.... again... I liked her

*Sits with Baz* 


im with these 2

Me too. I like common. I like normal ......................the twins are from a different world (and shagged out ole prossies to boot).

 

That's my take on it TBH ......they may have shoes that cost thousands of pounds and Natalies are from Dorothy Perkins ............that's not anything to do with jealousy - that's real!

And there Natalie did her epic fail..she was bragging in the week she did'nt have to worry about anything..just says, "yes I'll have it"..she has everything..she goes to Waterstones and buys hundreds of pounds worth of books she does'nt read..she's got clothes she'll never wear..she buys ÂĢ40 worth of fresh flowers a week for her house..she's a hypocrit....

I think she was "Knocking" herself for her spending habits, not congratulating herself stonks.

I disagree Syd..everything thats come out of her mouth has been a passive aggresive comment, they always have 2 meanings..eg..Michael is so annoying but I love him..the twins are over confidents but I like that..I could go on and I'm not the only person to see this side in her cos thats why she's out..She only had to say she over spent, she did'nt have to say what she spent her money on or that she never had to worry about money and if I was on the twins income I would'nt be buying shit shoes either....

But isn't that (the highlighted bit) EXACTLY what we are all like on here too...... How often  during BB  (and often in RL) do we say *well yes, so and so has their faults but I still really like them*? I know I said it dozen of times when Darnell was getting creamed Isn't that just being human.....???

Baz
Originally Posted by ~Lee~:

Difference being Baz as a viewer, unlike a fellow HM ,we are incapable of making life hell/miserable for them in there.She was as two faced as they come,what she said to their faces in comparison to what she said to the others behind their backs was worlds apart and had a detrimental impact for them.

House, forum or RL it's all the same to me Lee And given the anti Denise/pro Michael feeling I can't help but wonder (as I posted the other day) whether if Natalie had directed her *two facedness* towards Denise  the forum attitude would have been the same?

Baz
Originally Posted by Baz:
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by Syd:
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Tina:
Originally Posted by nuts:
Originally Posted by Baz:

Well I am going to buck the trend.... again... I liked her

*Sits with Baz* 


im with these 2

Me too. I like common. I like normal ......................the twins are from a different world (and shagged out ole prossies to boot).

 

That's my take on it TBH ......they may have shoes that cost thousands of pounds and Natalies are from Dorothy Perkins ............that's not anything to do with jealousy - that's real!

And there Natalie did her epic fail..she was bragging in the week she did'nt have to worry about anything..just says, "yes I'll have it"..she has everything..she goes to Waterstones and buys hundreds of pounds worth of books she does'nt read..she's got clothes she'll never wear..she buys ÂĢ40 worth of fresh flowers a week for her house..she's a hypocrit....

I think she was "Knocking" herself for her spending habits, not congratulating herself stonks.

I disagree Syd..everything thats come out of her mouth has been a passive aggresive comment, they always have 2 meanings..eg..Michael is so annoying but I love him..the twins are over confidents but I like that..I could go on and I'm not the only person to see this side in her cos thats why she's out..She only had to say she over spent, she did'nt have to say what she spent her money on or that she never had to worry about money and if I was on the twins income I would'nt be buying shit shoes either....

But isn't that (the highlighted bit) EXACTLY what we are all like on here too...... How often  during BB  (and often in RL) do we say *well yes, so and so has their faults but I still really like them*? I know I said it dozen of times when Darnell was getting creamed Isn't that just being human.....???

Not the way she did it Baz..she's bitchy and she shit stirred with Michael and Denise by telling Denise things back....

stonks
Originally Posted by Baz:
Originally Posted by ~Lee~:

Difference being Baz as a viewer, unlike a fellow HM ,we are incapable of making life hell/miserable for them in there.She was as two faced as they come,what she said to their faces in comparison to what she said to the others behind their backs was worlds apart and had a detrimental impact for them.

House, forum or RL it's all the same to me Lee And given the anti Denise/pro Michael feeling I can't help but wonder (as I posted the other day) whether if Natalie had directed her *two facedness* towards Denise  the forum attitude would have been the same?

From my standpoint yes,if she'd been as supercilious with Denise I'd feel the same.I never have and never will * Blindly* support anyone,if they're wrong they're wrong,if they're  right they're right.

~Lee~
Originally Posted by ~Lee~:
Originally Posted by Baz:
Originally Posted by ~Lee~:

Difference being Baz as a viewer, unlike a fellow HM ,we are incapable of making life hell/miserable for them in there.She was as two faced as they come,what she said to their faces in comparison to what she said to the others behind their backs was worlds apart and had a detrimental impact for them.

House, forum or RL it's all the same to me Lee And given the anti Denise/pro Michael feeling I can't help but wonder (as I posted the other day) whether if Natalie had directed her *two facedness* towards Denise  the forum attitude would have been the same?

From my standpoint yes,if she'd been as supercilious with Denise I'd feel the same.I never have and never will * Blindly* support anyone,if they're wrong they're wrong,if they're  right they're right.

And I will always like who I like and grrrrrrrr at who I don't

Baz
Originally Posted by Cinds:
Originally Posted by jacksonb:

I think it's a bit strong for folks to be calling the twins prossies.

 

I haven't called the prostitutes anywhere, but in all fairness, don't the playmates get a wage for being one of Hughs 'girlfriends'?

I don't think I was accusing  you of  anything, Iv'e seen the term used a few times now, and whether they get a  wedge for  being at the playboy  mansion or not,  makes no dfference to the fact that I think  calling them prossies is a bit strong.

 

It's like me calling Gareth a faggot and being pulled up on it and then me saying  'yes but he's admitted it, so  it's ok to call him a faggot'

 

And it's not really , is it?

jacksonb
Originally Posted by jacksonb:
Originally Posted by Cinds:
Originally Posted by jacksonb:

I think it's a bit strong for folks to be calling the twins prossies.

 

I haven't called the prostitutes anywhere, but in all fairness, don't the playmates get a wage for being one of Hughs 'girlfriends'?

I don't think I was accusing  you of  anything, Iv'e seen the term used a few times now, and whether they get a  wedge for  being at the playboy  mansion or not,  makes no dfference to the fact that I think  calling them prossies is a bit strong.

 

It's like me calling Gareth a faggot and being pulled up on it and then me saying  'yes but he's admitted it, so  it's ok to call him a faggot'

 

And it's not really , is it?

Senora Reyes
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by ~Lee~:

I  agree Stonks,who is really interested that she can afford to go to a book store and spend X amount of money of *Coffee table* books.

And never read them, I liked when in the diary room that Romeo said, "I know times are hard out there", when asking to be saved....

He is a darling,Krankie (Skanky and Kirk) really should look and learn from him.

~Lee~

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×