He should be punished.

He's a cheat hope BB expose him..

Yup! I noticed that too.

He changed it to Romeo after Nat's name was read out by Michael.(I think it was Michael?)

I've been wondering whether that's why the whole group is up, because he disregarded the rules.

On the HL thread I wrote that Nat had his vote(43mins)

He should be punished,he did change it and BB has specified that was not permitted.

he had a few names crossed out  on his board i think

Just showed it on BBBOTS and it clearly said 2-Nat.

I don't think he has been punished yet, because Gareth's not up. It seems that whoever got a vote automatically went up for eviction, nothing to do with Frankie's rule-breaks. He should be punished.

I agree.

To be fair it doesn't make any difference does it? as long as he didn't put Gareth at any point (which i don't think he did as all his crossing outs were short) it wouldn't have made and difference to the over all out come.

Maybe we should gloss over it for once, since they're all up....with the exception of Gareth, of course.

But if Nat had already been nommed and he had nommed her as well, then she would have had two noms, so those with only one nom each might not be up.

And they clearly stated more tha once, that they couldn't change their nominations once made or ALL housemates would be punished. Thi could be interesting.

But it was one nom and you were up .Romeo only got one vote, Frankie's. I do feel sorry for him .Frankie did say he only nomed him because he didn't think anyone else would.

Yes I saw that as well. I thought they were told they couldn't change their mind. And what happened about the punishment for talking which they continued to do.

Maybe I've missed something, but where did it say 'one nom and you're up' ?

Frankie should be punished for changing his noms but hey ho.

Sorry, but as far as I can see (unless I've missed something) you are making an assumption that BB put every one (except Gareth) up who had recieved  had recieved A nom, regardles of the number of noms. I don't see it that way at all.

I see it that they up the three HMs with the most noms and also anyone else who had the same number of noms as the third person - in the standard way of doing the noms.

I Have just watched it back .The first clip shown of Frankie's board shows(13 mins in) 1 twins ,then the second clip shows (17 mins in) 2 Nat .He then made his noms as Twins/Romeo if Romeo did not get a nom from Frankie he would not be up.Frankie changed Nat to Romeo.

I see where you're coming from Fluffy  

Thanks Velvet.

However I've now come across something that suggests that BB DID say that ANYONE with a nom wold be up.

Hey ho.

It looked more like four or five rubbed out from the birds nest haired eejit!

As far as the question of whether Frankie broke a rule or not.....

I am sure I read something (not sure where) about the noms can't be changed ONCE THEY ARE READ OUT....but nothing to say youcouldn't change your mind as often as you liked prior to that.

They said before they nominated once they wrote down the two names they could not change it, Michael was an easy target,I loved watching their faces when it was announced they were all up

I know, it was bewilderment all round mixed with hatred - 'How can we all be up? The twins and Michael got the most votes!'  Haha!

I think Michael might have had an inner smirk, seeing the wind taken out of their sails.