Replies sorted oldest to newest
Her next goal could well be a 6ft under.
Sproot 
That's GOT to be a joke, surely?
Hi Ev, yep she's heading that way
Well, if the photo's anything to go by Moomin, no 
And I thought I looked bad in shorts!!
I know it's the S*N 
but another link to the story
Eat 20 thousand calories a day 
I didn't think it was humanly possible Erin
She isn't well evidently, hope she gets help.
she's american, right?
That's a yes Jackson 
see comments under first link
*shakes head*
clearly not thinking about her children.
I will say I'm confused by that quote, which must not be direct: 'My next goal is to be 57 stone (800lbs) by the end of the year. At my current rate of growth, I should be 115 stone by age 41 or 42.' Americans don't use the term "stone".
Good point Lori. Have the British press converted it I wonder?
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
She's a Whopper!
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
She's a Whopper!
That might be her problem
680 for the burger. Extra calories for a slice of cheese. 360 for the fries.
Source
Burgerking.com
Originally Posted by erinp:
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
You may remember that we fled imperial rule. AND your bloody measurements. 
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
You may remember that we fled imperial rule. AND your bloody measurements.
I watched America's Biggest Loser and their weight was in pounds not kilos.
Originally Posted by Lori:
*shakes head*
clearly not thinking about her children.
I will say I'm confused by that quote, which must not be direct: 'My next goal is to be 57 stone (800lbs) by the end of the year. At my current rate of growth, I should be 115 stone by age 41 or 42.' Americans don't use the term "stone".
I know it's only 2 pounds difference, but why say 800 pounds when its actually 798 pounds?
They would have had to make the calculation, so why change the figure....unless the real calculation was 800 pounds to stones....and leave out the .142857?
i.e, 800 pounds = 57.142857 stones.
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
You may remember that we fled imperial rule. AND your bloody measurements.
But who's is the bestest?
Originally Posted by sprout:
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
You may remember that we fled imperial rule. AND your bloody measurements.
But who's is the bestest?
You have to ask
Originally Posted by sprout:
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
You may remember that we fled imperial rule. AND your bloody measurements.
But who's is the bestest?
Well, clearly YOU! You've got MUSHY PEAS!!! 
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by sprout:
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
You may remember that we fled imperial rule. AND your bloody measurements.
But who's is the bestest?
Well, clearly YOU! You've got MUSHY PEAS!!!
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by sprout:
Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Does the USA not use imperial measurement.
You may remember that we fled imperial rule. AND your bloody measurements.
But who's is the bestest?
Well, clearly YOU! You've got MUSHY PEAS!!!
Minted ones at that!
Originally Posted by sprout:
Minted ones at that!
Sure, rub it in, sprout. 
Awwww Lori 
Bizarre.
She isn't well evidently, hope she gets help.
Amen to that. 
Shes obviously decided to go out with a bang 
Nice shorts I do enjoy a good shorts disaster
*wanders through thread feeling positively Twiggy-esque*
I saw this story in a magazine as well...she obviously needs the money for her food bills....
I agree that she also has a problem...can't concerned family/friends get her sectioned? They would if she was starving herself....
Some people find that sort of thing hot...i watched a thing once on c4 about feeders...these men were getting off on it still it takes allsorts I guess
I don't understand though why the woman herself, at the point when her legs started looking fat in shorts, thought, "I know, I wont wear shorts as they are not all that flattering" maybe she thinks she is hot too
Originally Posted by zazz:
I don't understand though why the woman herself, at the point when her legs started looking fat in shorts, thought, "I know, I wont wear shorts as they are not all that flattering" maybe she thinks she is hot too
in the article I read, she signed up to SSBBW (Super sized big beautiful women) and men PAY for pics of her, clothed and nekkid as well as pics of her eating/gorging herself...she makes a fair bit from it from what I could gather....
Originally Posted by zazz:
Some people find that sort of thing hot...i watched a thing once on c4 about feeders...these men were getting off on it still it takes allsorts I guess
I saw that too...was quite disturbing....
Originally Posted by MrsB:
Originally Posted by zazz:
I don't understand though why the woman herself, at the point when her legs started looking fat in shorts, thought, "I know, I wont wear shorts as they are not all that flattering" maybe she thinks she is hot too
in the article I read, she signed up to SSBBW (Super sized big beautiful women) and men PAY for pics of her, clothed and nekkid as well as pics of her eating/gorging herself...she makes a fair bit from it from what I could gather....
I'd pay to not have to see such sites