HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
That has to take the award for worst photoshopping EVER! 
*has a sudden thought*
You didn't make it yourself did you Blizz?
Edit:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
IMO That has to take the award for worst photoshopping EVER!
There.... now she can't be cross with me.
No, I didn't, cos it ain't even a photoshop!
True fact, IMO, with humbling honesty!!
Originally Posted by Issy:
Originally Posted by PeterCat:
Originally Posted by Issy:
I use it a lot - saves a lot of upset I think
I hate "just my opinion" though...it is too self self-deprecating and does annoy me
Oh and Prom, it is in my HONEST opinion...not humble
It can be either. Don't be so bliddy stroppy
He started it
And you carried it on. Now it's time to stop, both of you. Or I'm going to have to find a Naughty Step for each of you.
*taps foot*
Originally Posted by PeterCat:
Originally Posted by Issy:
Originally Posted by PeterCat:
Originally Posted by Issy:
I use it a lot - saves a lot of upset I think
I hate "just my opinion" though...it is too self self-deprecating and does annoy me
Oh and Prom, it is in my HONEST opinion...not humble
It can be either. Don't be so bliddy stroppy
He started it
And you carried it on. Now it's time to stop, both of you. Or I'm going to have to find a Naughty Step for each of you.
*taps foot*
*mutters* you know what you can do with your naughty step...
Just because SOMEONE likes EQ2 like you, you are on his side..
Not fair.
*stamps feet*
Originally Posted by PeterCat:
Originally Posted by Issy:
Originally Posted by PeterCat:
Originally Posted by Issy:
I use it a lot - saves a lot of upset I think
I hate "just my opinion" though...it is too self self-deprecating and does annoy me
Oh and Prom, it is in my HONEST opinion...not humble
It can be either. Don't be so bliddy stroppy
He started it
And you carried it on. Now it's time to stop, both of you. Or I'm going to have to find a Naughty Step for each of you.
*taps foot*
I wanna see ya put a grown up ova ya knee
Originally Posted by Abo:
I wanna see ya put a grown up ova ya knee
Oh gawd Abo, don't tempt her 
Seniora started the nonsense about imho about something soozywoo said during the last BB. All we do on hnere is spout our own opinion and we shouldn't be made to say 'imho'.
Originally Posted by disley21:
As far as I've seen there are two uses for IMO on the internets. The first (which is the one I use it for if I ever do), is to avoid having some smart arse come along and imply that I'm trying to put forward my opinion as fact when it should be fairly obvious that it was just an opinion.
For example, if I say some movie or whatever is shit, it should be fairly clear that that is just my take on the movie and that I'm not trying to claim some universal viewpoint that everybody would think it's shit. So by doing that I'm saving time by not having to first of all read said smart arses response and secondly by not having to point out that it was just my take and that people are free to disagree with it.
The second use that I've encountered is those instances where people will say complete and utter nonsense and use IMO as a defence of that nonsense, as if we're just supposed to accept what they say when it's so glaringly incorrect all because of the IMO qualifier.
For example, putting IMO in the midst of a statement where you're declaring that you think a dog is actually a cat doesn't mean you can go around saying dogs are cats without expecting to be called out on it. These special types then seem to think that pointing out a dog isn't actually a cat is some kind of vile personal attack, but then that's because they're certifiable nutjobs...
Oh yes I've had one of those forcing an IMHO down my throat when it was clear it was only my opinion....
Unbelievably I have just posted something on a professional forum that I belong to and I used the expression that any nurse who was not in a union in this day and age "needed their head testing" - as a sort of light hearted comment, meaning that it was the safe thing to do and who would not be in a union in our profession?
I was picked up on it and asked to explain exactly what it was I meant by that? Why did they need their head testing if they were not in a union.. blah blah..
So I have now started to use IMO on there...
That should cover it
Originally Posted by Abo:
Originally Posted by PeterCat:
Originally Posted by Issy:
Originally Posted by PeterCat:
Originally Posted by Issy:
I use it a lot - saves a lot of upset I think
I hate "just my opinion" though...it is too self self-deprecating and does annoy me
Oh and Prom, it is in my HONEST opinion...not humble
It can be either. Don't be so bliddy stroppy
He started it
And you carried it on. Now it's time to stop, both of you. Or I'm going to have to find a Naughty Step for each of you.
*taps foot*
I wanna see ya put a grown up ova ya knee
I need payment up front for that sort of service.
...Gets camera ready to click click click...
The negatives are out there Syd.
Originally Posted by Issy:
Unbelievably I have just posted something on a professional forum that I belong to and I used the expression that any nurse who was not in a union in this day and age "needed their head testing" - as a sort of light hearted comment, meaning that it was the safe thing to do and who would not be in a union in our profession?
I was picked up on it and asked to explain exactly what it was I meant by that? Why did they need their head testing if they were not in a union.. blah blah..
So I have now started to use IMO on there...
That should cover it
You should have used EEG instead
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by disley21:
As far as I've seen there are two uses for IMO on the internets. The first (which is the one I use it for if I ever do), is to avoid having some smart arse come along and imply that I'm trying to put forward my opinion as fact when it should be fairly obvious that it was just an opinion.
For example, if I say some movie or whatever is shit, it should be fairly clear that that is just my take on the movie and that I'm not trying to claim some universal viewpoint that everybody would think it's shit. So by doing that I'm saving time by not having to first of all read said smart arses response and secondly by not having to point out that it was just my take and that people are free to disagree with it.
The second use that I've encountered is those instances where people will say complete and utter nonsense and use IMO as a defence of that nonsense, as if we're just supposed to accept what they say when it's so glaringly incorrect all because of the IMO qualifier.
For example, putting IMO in the midst of a statement where you're declaring that you think a dog is actually a cat doesn't mean you can go around saying dogs are cats without expecting to be called out on it. These special types then seem to think that pointing out a dog isn't actually a cat is some kind of vile personal attack, but then that's because they're certifiable nutjobs...
Oh yes I've had one of those forcing an IMHO down my throat when it was clear it was only my opinion....
Only one stonksy?
I don't think I ever use it, just posting 'i think.....' covers it.
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Seniora started the nonsense about imho about something soozywoo said during the last BB. All we do on hnere is spout our own opinion and we shouldn't be made to say 'imho'.
I am curious now; what was it that was said? 
Seeing as how you have brought it up/mentioned it on this thread, it would make more sense to know what was said.
Originally Posted by Croctacus:
I don't think I ever use it, just posting 'i think.....' covers it.
yeah 'I think'; 'I believe'; 'in my experience' all cover it. Sometimes IMO and IMHO make a sentence flow better too.
Originally Posted by Shar:
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by disley21:
As far as I've seen there are two uses for IMO on the internets. The first (which is the one I use it for if I ever do), is to avoid having some smart arse come along and imply that I'm trying to put forward my opinion as fact when it should be fairly obvious that it was just an opinion.
For example, if I say some movie or whatever is shit, it should be fairly clear that that is just my take on the movie and that I'm not trying to claim some universal viewpoint that everybody would think it's shit. So by doing that I'm saving time by not having to first of all read said smart arses response and secondly by not having to point out that it was just my take and that people are free to disagree with it.
The second use that I've encountered is those instances where people will say complete and utter nonsense and use IMO as a defence of that nonsense, as if we're just supposed to accept what they say when it's so glaringly incorrect all because of the IMO qualifier.
For example, putting IMO in the midst of a statement where you're declaring that you think a dog is actually a cat doesn't mean you can go around saying dogs are cats without expecting to be called out on it. These special types then seem to think that pointing out a dog isn't actually a cat is some kind of vile personal attack, but then that's because they're certifiable nutjobs...
Oh yes I've had one of those forcing an IMHO down my throat when it was clear it was only my opinion....
Only one stonksy?
Well you always remember your first shar....
Originally Posted by Croctacus:
I don't think I ever use it, just posting 'i think.....' covers it.
I don't think I've used it either. If push comes to shove I use 'reckon'. As in I reckon
Originally Posted by Baz:
I'm feeling argumentative, so can I just say that IMO/IMHO there is nothing wrong with it
.... unless of course you are going to shout at me , in which case I agree it's totally unnecessary
I AGREE WITH YOU IMO, IMHO TSB YMCA
ITTPHLOC!!!!!1KBOOTB!
IMO
Originally Posted by zazz:
ITTPHLOC!!!!!1KBOOTB!
IMO
That sir is unsubstantiated drivel and who on earth would agree with it?
IMHO
Originally Posted by Issy:
Originally Posted by zazz:
ITTPHLOC!!!!!1KBOOTB!
IMO
That sir is unsubstantiated drivel and who on earth would agree with it?
IMHO
TWYT!