Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Abo:

ohhhh there are so many things I would like to say but the British PC Brigade would have a field day.

 

 

Syd replies.......No British PCs here....or of the few that are here they have removed their badges......feel free to speak......we will feel feel free to respond xxxxxxx

 

 

Syd
Originally Posted by Syd:
Originally Posted by Abo:

ohhhh there are so many things I would like to say but the British PC Brigade would have a field day.

 

 

Syd replies.......No British PCs here....or of the few that are here they have removed their badges......feel free to speak......we will feel feel free to respond xxxxxxx

 

 

She's not normally shy Syd - don't know what has gotten into her 

slimfern
Originally Posted by Syd:
Originally Posted by Prometheus:
Originally Posted by Syd:

Anyway.....should the two wheeling peeps on the road without an engine pay "Road Tax"?......

 

If you use the road the answer should probably be yes. If you're sane and regardless of whether you're cycling or driving if you're being taxed just for using the road the answer should probably be no.


What is road tax for?

 

Somebody, somewhere, can answer that question. That somebody clearly isn't me 

Prometheus

just a little taster of how un PC I am.

 

Charging for air - ummm who else would think of such a thing?

 

A points system for people crossing the road & collecting said person eg: freckles, hair, age, lollipop person, tattooed person, dick with briefcase, spotty teenager etc

 

Then the same for actually cleaning said description off car eg: bloody freckles would stick like shit & be hard to get off etc etc

 

And I think I shall have offended enough with that above.

Abo
Originally Posted by Abo:

just a little taster of how un PC I am.

 

Charging for air - ummm who else would think of such a thing?

 

A points system for people crossing the road & collecting said person eg: freckles, hair, age, lollipop person, tattooed person, dick with briefcase, spotty teenager etc

 

Then the same for actually cleaning said description off car eg: bloody freckles would stick like shit & be hard to get off etc etc

 

And I think I shall have offended enough with that above.

 I have a freckle in the corner of my eye - does that count ?

slimfern

I think cyclists should be made to undergo some sort of  competency test before venturing out on to roads, People constantly moan about car drivers and bikes but some of the cyclists I see are truly awful.

 

They cycle in the dark with no reflective gear or lights on. Cut across red lights, cut across lanes, ride 2,3 abreast and they get away with it.

Oh and no they should not be allowed to cycle on the pavement Pedestrians have been killed and injured by cyclists before now.

FM

considering the  amount of council tax that is used to create cycle paths,  that the majority of cyclists  studiously avoid using  in  my area, then they should  be paying some thing  for them.

 

£88,000 my local council spent on  creating 4 miles of dual carriageway cycle path  from  my village to the local town,  the cycle path is the  width of  a road carriageway  and it runs along  a narrow lane,in places,it's a beautiful creation, do the cyclists use  it? of course they don't they prefer  to amble along the road, smoking a  fag and admiring the view  whilst all the world and his  brother get stuck behind them  for the duration.

 

thank god for electric windows eh?  you can  wind them  down, lean over as you get abreast of the cyclist and shout at him  really loud...

jacksonb
Originally Posted by Clumsycat:

no, they shouldnt, should people who walk everywhere pay road tax cause they use the road to cross.. should fat bastards pay to walk on the road as they are more likely to damage it? ... no...

Well said

 

I am a fairweather cyclist - when the weather is nice I cycle into work and back, 7 miles each way. I use the cycle path where there is one.

 

Should I pay road tax? I do pay road tax, because when the weather isn't nice I drive

Rexi

The state of the roads at the minute I don't even think car drivers should be paying road tax.... it's like a slalom course on the main road to work atm with all the potholes and the council say they can't afford to fix them.

Kaffs
Interesting! More importantly these islands have never been geared up for cycling. The more advanced euro nations bend over backwards to provide routes. They have the benefits of a lack of road transport lobbies. Meanwhile I cycle in the country and recognise and greet the same cyclists, pedestrians, horses, and car drivers each day. I suspect it's different in the cities.
Garage Joe
Originally Posted by Garage Joe:
Interesting! More importantly these islands have never been geared up for cycling. The more advanced euro nations bend over backwards to provide routes. They have the benefits of a lack of road transport lobbies. Meanwhile I cycle in the country and recognise and greet the same cyclists, pedestrians, horses, and car drivers each day. I suspect it's different in the cities.

I see a lot of cyclists Jo cos I am quite a rural area, On the whole I have no problems with them. TI think road tax is a bit extreme but I still maintain that they should have some awareness of the road and rules of the road. It protects them as well as the car drivers.

FM
Originally Posted by Rexi:
Originally Posted by Clumsycat:

no, they shouldnt, should people who walk everywhere pay road tax cause they use the road to cross.. should fat bastards pay to walk on the road as they are more likely to damage it? ... no...

Well said

 

I am a fairweather cyclist - when the weather is nice I cycle into work and back, 7 miles each way. I use the cycle path where there is one.

 

Should I pay road tax? I do pay road tax, because when the weather isn't nice I drive


exactly, my dad cycles everywhere now cause he cant drive due to having a brain tumour, but he drove all his life & paid road tax & wages tax... so to tax him now for cycling (he also does sponsored rides for charity) would be an outrage.

 

BTW nothing against fat people.. not too slender myself

Clumsycat
Originally Posted by Karma_:

As for charging cyclists? Well, they are road users too. They are also able to skip through red lights with no comeback, pay no congestion charge...etc.

 

And before anyone says they don't cause congestion, try driving from West to South London in the morning, it's like the bloody Tour de France

 

I think if people use a bike to commute on a daily basis, especially in high traffic/ built up areas, then maybe they should pay some kind of fee to do so? On the flip side of that though they are not protected by insurance. So us drivers can play skittles all day long, a granny is 50 points they literally take their life into their hands when they venture out on to the roads with nothing to back them up if you get what I mean.

 

I still get a cold chill when I see toddlers or small children on a bike with their parents on the road in heavy traffic areas. It's not as common now, thankfully.

 

We pay tax and Insurance but Karma!

RiverRock
Originally Posted by Syd:

RIVERROCK.............what is this 'Road Tax' of which you speak, and send us all of a quiver?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_tax

 

In the United Kingdom owners are required to pay Vehicle Excise Duty, commonly known as "car tax", "vehicle tax" or "road tax", which is paid to the government for a vehicle licence, which must be displayed on most motor vehicles used on public roadsSince 1937 there has been no direct relationship between the tax and government expenditure on public roads. The registered keeper of a vehicle that is not used or kept on public roads must complete a Statutory Off Road Notification (SORN).

 

_______________

 

So it is basically being paid for the use of the road, not highway repairs. Cyclists use the road they hold me back when I am going somewhere but I am paying for the privilege that are not. Since they are not they should be made stop and let a car take precedence unless they are paying for their right to be there.Like I say you pedestrians would have a different opinion if you were paying over £150 to sit behind bicycles.

RiverRock
Originally Posted by RiverRock:
Originally Posted by Karma_:

As for charging cyclists? Well, they are road users too. They are also able to skip through red lights with no comeback, pay no congestion charge...etc.

 

And before anyone says they don't cause congestion, try driving from West to South London in the morning, it's like the bloody Tour de France

 

I think if people use a bike to commute on a daily basis, especially in high traffic/ built up areas, then maybe they should pay some kind of fee to do so? On the flip side of that though they are not protected by insurance. So us drivers can play skittles all day long, a granny is 50 points they literally take their life into their hands when they venture out on to the roads with nothing to back them up if you get what I mean.

 

I still get a cold chill when I see toddlers or small children on a bike with their parents on the road in heavy traffic areas. It's not as common now, thankfully.

 

We pay tax and Insurance but Karma!

 

You pay tax and insurance to use the road?! Didn't know that! If that's the case then I'll shut me trap

Karma_

No.

 

But they should be made to wear reflective clothing, helmets and have working lights after dark. They amount of near misses I've had is scary especially when some idiot is wearing dark clothing with no lights.

carpet
Originally Posted by Karma_:

You pay tax and insurance to use the road?! Didn't know that! If that's the case then I'll shut me trap

I mean Motorists pay tax and insurance! So we are covered for accident as well as having to pay to use the road. I was referring to the point yo said earlier about cyclists not being insured so they were taking a risk.

RiverRock

No, for one thing, a lot of them are children, but aside from that, compared to a car, a bike really doesn't put any wear and tear on the road surface.  It's almost like asking pedestrians to pay a 'pavement' tax.

Carnelian
Originally Posted by Carnelian:

No, for one thing, a lot of them are children, but aside from that, compared to a car, a bike really doesn't put any wear and tear on the road surface.  It's almost like asking pedestrians to pay a 'pavement' tax.

Car tax doesn't go towards road repairs

RiverRock
Originally Posted by ッmufッ:
Originally Posted by Karma_:

You pay tax and insurance to use the road?! Didn't know that! If that's the case then I'll shut me trap

Well what's left of the roads anyhoo!!

 

Oh stick your HRT patch back on and stop moaning

 

 

Originally Posted by RiverRock:
Originally Posted by Karma_:

You pay tax and insurance to use the road?! Didn't know that! If that's the case then I'll shut me trap

I mean Motorists pay tax and insurance! So we are covered for accident as well as having to pay to use the road. I was referring to the point yo said earlier about cyclists not being insured so they were taking a risk.

 

Ohhhhhh! Well, being the impartial soul that I am I do try and see all sides of a situation (well, I have done with this issue just don't forget knocking over a granny is 50 points )

Karma_

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×