- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Yes, a true liability and up his own arse - but who wouldn't be when they've been toadied to since the day of their birth and for no other reason than an accident of birth. A liability like the rest of that parasitical and pointless family.
No 10 adds pressure on Duke to resign as trade envoy
Downing Street would âshed no tearsâ if the Duke of York resigned as UK trade envoy, government sources said yesterday, amid growing Cabinet concern about his conduct and the first signs that his job might be downgraded. Senior sources said that they could not dismiss the Duke but were unwilling to shore up his position after he came under attack over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted paedophile. The Duke has also faced criticism for his alleged links to Saif Gaddafi, the son of the Libyan leader, and for entertaining at Buckingham Palace the son-in-law of the ousted Tunisian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.
The Duchess of York accepted ÂĢ15,000 from Prince Andrewâs convicted child sex offender friend to help pay off her debts, the Daily Mail can reveal.
In a deal that Sarah Ferguson has claimed was brokered by her ex-husband, disgraced billionaire Jeffrey Epstein paid the money directly to her former personal assistant, Johnny OâSullivan.
Mr OâSullivan, 42, was owed ÂĢ78,000 in unpaid wages and bills thanks to the lavish lifestyle which left the duchess ÂĢ5million in debt.
Last night, she accepted that she was wrong to rely financially on the disgraced Epstein and vowed to return the cash.
But her sensational admission is yet another blow to the beleaguered Duke of York, already fighting to save his job as UK trade envoy. It came as:
â The Prime Minister requested a personal briefing on the full extent of the allegations against the duke;
â Ministers privately indicated they would not âshed any tearsâ if he fell on his sword;
â The woman at the centre of the claims, Virginia Roberts, said she was prepared to testify to the FBI about her relationship and time âaloneâ with the duke;
â It was revealed that two more women were asked under oath if they had ever had sex with Andrew at Epsteinâs mansion. Both declined to answer
The only shocking thing is that they are still monarchs of these once great isles
Like the way one is thinking of the reputation of the Monarchy and not the fact that being great mates with a convicted paedo is on a human scale, questionable in its own right, let alone the damage to the family's rep.
Can just imagine her: "Yo son, now you sit yo assss down a second boy. Now let me tell ya, if u keep on knockin around with dat dodgy sonovabitch you gawn have people talkin in dis here hood u hear what aam sayin? Now dis family, wees got a rep to protect. Ya dig?"
I have no time for these fokkers!!!!!!!!
I have no time for these fokkers!!!!!!!!
Seriously, it's enough to make you sick!!
Listening to Jazz FM
No comment on what the M6 does for one's mojo, though.
Don't see why he should be sacked over it, unless it's a case of hidden agendas were peeps have been looking to get rid of him for a while. After all, one of the photos was dated December wasn't it? It's March now. Surely whoever took the photo knew the scandal it would cause, so why only come out with it now?