Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Reference:
Thank you for posting that link Rawky. The trailers and clips look amazing! I can't wait, though I'm a wee bit peeved it's in two parts. Still, I guess they might have had to condense it too much to do it in one, but it reekes of money grabbing to me.
They should have been split into two parts from Goblet of Fire onwards IMO. Every film since then has skipped too much important stuff from the books.
disley21
Reference disley21 Today at 12:30:
They should have been split into two parts from Goblet of Fire onwards IMO. Every film since then has skipped too much important stuff from the books.
When the first film came out, the concern in the industry was that children wouldn't be prepared to sit through a film that was 2 and a half hours long. As it turned out, the only real complaint from the fans was that some details had been changed from the book, and many wished that the film had been even longer!

The "Deathly Hallows" is nearly 3 times the length of the first book, and it's not even the longest in the series...
Eugene's Lair
Read the whole collection and watched them all... sadly none of the movies so far have been up to scratch and seemed to have missed out vital scenes. The Philosopher's stone (the first movie) seemed to have got the closest out of them all. From then on it went downhill, the half blood prince looked a  piss poor lazy attempt...

I suppose the final one is split into two parts... so Warner Bros. are either cashing in or genuinely care about the film.

A shame really, because I thought the actors/actresses they had playing the characters fitted JK Rowlings description of those in the book perfectly...
MrMincePie

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×