We've (most of us) have seen the highlighted sequences/footages of John James' various gripes with Rachael, while she was a HM in the House. Before confronting her, he pussy-footed about and whined obsessively to the other HM's about her 'look' then he picked up the courage to confront her about his pettiness complaint. In the particular garden clip, he was shown as saying to Rachael: "you look at me as if I'm an idiot" - NB: this perception of him was never actually verbalized by Rachael.
He then went on to say to certain HMs:" I can't stand girls like that" - obviously relating and, indicating past-tense experiences with a specific type of girl(s).
We've seen various footage of his 'style' of argument - like a dog with a bone, he just won't give it up. HE, by his own admission has said stated that, he's GOT to have the 'Last Word' in an argument and described by example, his style of posting on youtube as being relentless when debating with other posters - to the point of the recipient blocking him.
A recent clip shown on the C4 HL show, with him and Josie in the bathtub bantering (can't remember the exact words) and they were light-heartedly opposing each other, with a type of "yes they will, No they won't" childlike exchange. It was very important, even in this instance, for John James to feel like the victor, by saying to Josie: "you lost, give it up, you lost" - complete with a smug expression on his face. His own MOTHER, while recently appearing on BBLB, stated how he pursues her to the Loo JUST to have the last word, FFS!
Yeah yeah, for the sake of his apologists those with a counter-argument - Rachael was equally snidey during the clip shown on the C4 HL show yesterday. However, where Rachael is concerned John James' behaviour shows all the hallmarks of 'implicit attitude' - an attitude activated without conscious awareness by memory of past experiences, as when a Man (or Woman) meets a member of the opposite sex and takes an instant dislike to him/her because for example, the person reminds them unconsciously of an uncle/aunt/BF/GF - but in JJ's case, Rachael reminds him of the 'type' of girl(s) that are perceived (by many) as physically attractive and confident, and perhaps made him feel inadequate in some way, and/or unable to control.
During this recent clip with Rachael, John James' forte of being the MOST catty bitch was amplified.Yes, he did say the only thing Rachael wouldn't do, is to have sex for money (words to that effect) but he didn't say this because of his high opinion of her - he alluded quite the opposite with the 'safe' subliminal method, but remembered the camera's were rolling and tried to fool didn't want to be misunderstood by the viewers for fear of reprisal .
All the events surrounding John James, resonates his ruthless competitive streak to 'win' an argument at any cost - as well as insecurities, and his persecution-complexes.
Having said all that, I suspect John James does have a (debatable) 'fun' and endearing side,
we ALL have, but we're always judged by the most prominent side of our personalities - albeit most or less desirable.
Rant over.
He then went on to say to certain HMs:" I can't stand girls like that" - obviously relating and, indicating past-tense experiences with a specific type of girl(s).
We've seen various footage of his 'style' of argument - like a dog with a bone, he just won't give it up. HE, by his own admission has said stated that, he's GOT to have the 'Last Word' in an argument and described by example, his style of posting on youtube as being relentless when debating with other posters - to the point of the recipient blocking him.
A recent clip shown on the C4 HL show, with him and Josie in the bathtub bantering (can't remember the exact words) and they were light-heartedly opposing each other, with a type of "yes they will, No they won't" childlike exchange. It was very important, even in this instance, for John James to feel like the victor, by saying to Josie: "you lost, give it up, you lost" - complete with a smug expression on his face. His own MOTHER, while recently appearing on BBLB, stated how he pursues her to the Loo JUST to have the last word, FFS!
Yeah yeah, for the sake of his apologists those with a counter-argument - Rachael was equally snidey during the clip shown on the C4 HL show yesterday. However, where Rachael is concerned John James' behaviour shows all the hallmarks of 'implicit attitude' - an attitude activated without conscious awareness by memory of past experiences, as when a Man (or Woman) meets a member of the opposite sex and takes an instant dislike to him/her because for example, the person reminds them unconsciously of an uncle/aunt/BF/GF - but in JJ's case, Rachael reminds him of the 'type' of girl(s) that are perceived (by many) as physically attractive and confident, and perhaps made him feel inadequate in some way, and/or unable to control.
During this recent clip with Rachael, John James' forte of being the MOST catty bitch was amplified.Yes, he did say the only thing Rachael wouldn't do, is to have sex for money (words to that effect) but he didn't say this because of his high opinion of her - he alluded quite the opposite with the 'safe' subliminal method, but remembered the camera's were rolling and tried to fool didn't want to be misunderstood by the viewers for fear of reprisal .
All the events surrounding John James, resonates his ruthless competitive streak to 'win' an argument at any cost - as well as insecurities, and his persecution-complexes.
Having said all that, I suspect John James does have a (debatable) 'fun' and endearing side,
we ALL have, but we're always judged by the most prominent side of our personalities - albeit most or less desirable.
Rant over.
*
, the list is JJ1 list............it's set in it's ways and never changes. 
That'll do me then....I'll toddle off happy. 
