Feckin Hasbeen!
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Not wanting to be too controversial, but does that have any bearing on him having an opinion on BB?
So what? He has an opinion ...........it's as valid as anyone else's isn't it? At least i recognise him ...................I don;t recognise half the folks on that show ...............who's the pink haired bimbo.
They all have opinions like all of us ..............just because it doesn't always agree with our own doesn't make the opinions invalid does it?
They all have opinions like all of us ..............just because it doesn't always agree with our own doesn't make the opinions invalid does it?
Reference:
Not wanting to be too controversial, but does that have any bearing on him having an opinion on BB?
I was just going to ask the same
Former Member
they are all cretins on that show...
that stupid bint with the flower in her hair
and Davina clearly fancies him -god I HATE her,
that stupid bint with the flower in her hair
and Davina clearly fancies him -god I HATE her,
No but he gets on my tits...My opinion!...
Former Member
Reference:
They all have opinions like all of us ..............just because it doesn't always agree with our own doesn't make the opinions invalid does it?
Actually IMO (LOL) if the opinion is morally reprehensible then yes it does make it invalid.Reference:
Actually IMO (LOL) if the opinion is morally reprehensible then yes it does make it invalid.
Reference:
No but he gets on my tits...My opinion
and mine he's an absolute foolReference:
Actually IMO (LOL) if the opinion is morally reprehensible then yes it does make it invalid.
That's very subjective, but I'll go along with it. Reference:
Actually IMO (LOL) if the opinion is morally reprehensible then yes it does make it invalid.
I'm not sure an opinion can ever be invalid on the grounds of it being morally reprehensible, if you think about it. It can be ignored but it still exists. If it's conclusion follows logically from it's premises then it is valid.
Reference:
If it's conclusion follows logically from it's premises then it is valid.
that's way too deep for me at this time of night
Reference:
I'm not sure an opinion can ever be invalid on the grounds of it being morally reprehensible, if you think about it. It can be ignored but it still exists. If it's conclusion follows logically from it's premises then it is valid.
As everything. Reference:
If it's conclusion follows logically from it's premises then it is valid.
Bateman stop showing off..
Former Member
Reference:
It can be ignored but it still exists. If it's conclusion follows logically from it's premises then it is valid.
Okay.... if I were to say that IMO paedophiles are okay just have different sexual practices, would my opinion be valid?Reference:
I'm not sure an opinion can ever be invalid on the grounds of it being morally reprehensible, if you think about it.
Everyone's got an opinion of course, but some people should be told what their opinion is instead of troubling their three brain cells trying to blurt one out.
Bateman - I think what you are trying to say is that "Opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one".
I don't know of the arguments that might be used in that situation to judge that. Validity just implies internal logic. That is all. Something can be valid but morally repugnant.
Reference:
Bateman - I think what you are trying to say is that "Opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one".
Orrr there is this.
Former Member
Reference:
Something can be valid but morally repugnant.
what do you mean by valid though? What would you say defines validity?Reference:
Something can be valid but morally repugnant.
I managed to catch myself before replying to someone on another thread excusing JJ's behaviour because he was fit. I was going to ask if they would applaud the behaviour of a certain gentleman during world war 2 if he had been 'fit'. It's the most pathetic excuse for forgiving vile behaviour I've ever heard.Reference:
I managed to catch myself before replying to someone on another thread excusing JJ's behaviour because he was fit. I was going to ask if they would applaud the behaviour of a certain gentleman during world war 2 if he had been 'fit'. It's the most pathetic excuse for forgiving vile behaviour I've ever heard.
Agreed.
Reference: Prom
It's the most pathetic excuse for forgiving vile behaviour I've ever heard.
My late mother lived in the USA during the time of the Ted Bundy(College) killings and she could never get over the many women who refused to believe he had killed because he was "cute". Disclaimer: Not comparing John James to an American serial killer.
Reference:
What would you say defines validity?
I've already said - internal logic. If it can be said that premiseA plus premiseB could lead to C,D,E or Z or whatever, it has logic and is valid. To say something is valid doesn't imply agreement nor social or moral acceptability. At all.
What the hell are we talking about this for?
Reference:
Not comparing John James to an American serial killer.
Spoilsport
As 99% of people now walk about with a phone clamped to their ears like they think they are in charge of pressing the nuclear button, someone wants to tell Mr Joly that bellowing into a mobile phone was not funny just disgustingly prophetic.
<begin. I hate mobile phones and most mobile phone users </end>
None of you are that important, seriously NONE of you. *ducks*
<begin. I hate mobile phones and most mobile phone users </end>
None of you are that important, seriously NONE of you. *ducks*
Former Member
Reference:
I've already said - internal logic. If it can be said that premiseA plus premiseB could lead to C,D,E or Z or whatever, it has logic and is valid. To say something is valid doesn't imply agreement nor social or moral acceptability. At all. What the hell are we talking about this for?
gawd knows...It is friday night - here have a chicken
Ta *lobs it out the window*
Former Member
Reference:
Ta *lobs it out the window*
Wut the hell else am I supposed to do with it? Get all AndrewMelontastic on its ass?
Former Member
Reference:
Wut the hell else am I supposed to do with it? Get all AndrewMelontastic on its ass?
EAT it!!I roasted it all evening .... ,lovingly and shoved butter in its unmentionables.
I carn't. I do not eat feather or fur. So I liberated it. Out the window.
Former Member
Reference:
I carn't. I do not eat feather or fur. So I liberated it. Out the window.
It can't flypoor chicken
Reference:
It can't fly
I noticed. What did you stuff it with, lead?
Former Member
Reference:
I noticed. What did you stuff it with, lead?
might have...well the church has too much anyway
Reference:
I've already said - internal logic. If it can be said that premiseA plus premiseB could lead to C,D,E or Z or whatever, it has logic and is valid. To say something is valid doesn't imply agreement nor social or moral acceptability. At all.
Are you an MP?
Dom Joly has never been funny.
Reference:
Dom Joly has never been funny.
I concurReference:
I've already said - internal logic. If it can be said that premiseA plus premiseB could lead to C,D,E or Z or whatever, it has logic and is valid. To say something is valid doesn't imply agreement nor social or moral acceptability. At all.
Load of rubbish. Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
1,278 online (3 members
/
1,275 guests),
0 chatting