Was anyone-else bothered by BB broadcasting Laura's comments about her boyfriend cheating on her (and naming him, no less)?
I don't wish to defend the guy if Laura's story's true, but that "if" is of course part of the problem here: we've only heard Laura's side of it. Alex has just been labelled a cheat on a programme watched my millions, and he hasn't got the right to reply.
My real problem, though, is that normally HM conversations about friends and family bring down the birdsong and aeroplane noises faster than you can say "Ofcom". So why did BB think it OK to "name and shame" somone this time?
I don't wish to defend the guy if Laura's story's true, but that "if" is of course part of the problem here: we've only heard Laura's side of it. Alex has just been labelled a cheat on a programme watched my millions, and he hasn't got the right to reply.
My real problem, though, is that normally HM conversations about friends and family bring down the birdsong and aeroplane noises faster than you can say "Ofcom". So why did BB think it OK to "name and shame" somone this time?