they really didn't want her to win did they 
Replies sorted oldest to newest
That was just disrespectful of the voters (who pay C4 their wages)
Missed that. What was said?
nasty
and they were inplying that we shouldnt vote bea out as she is interesting
and they were inplying that we shouldnt vote bea out as she is interesting
quote:Originally posted by Tiddly~Wink:
Missed that. What was said?
if you don't vote, you will end up with a boring winner
quote:Originally posted by Blackpudlian:
That was just disrespectful of the voters (who pay C4 their wages)
They really don't like the fact that the viewers don't always do what they want, do they?
quote:Originally posted by Tiddly~Wink:
Missed that. What was said?
public info video telling us to keep in bea as they dont want a boring one like rachel from last year to win
i liked rachel
bb sucks
Nope but makes me all the more satisfied that it still hurts them like hell.quote:Originally posted by Aimee:
Quite. But then they back Dogface who instead of being quiet and nice is quiet and bitchy.
quote:Originally posted by Baz:
Give me Rachel over Bea any day!! And I was a Darnell fan
Easy on there Baz!
I'm mean Bea's bad... but...
quote:Originally posted by Baz:
Give me Rachel over Bea any day!! And I was a Darnell fan
and me
To me that advert for voters to vote and if we dont then the boring ones will win, ermmmm the public can only vote for who ever is nominated and when its the last 3/6 then the public will vote for who they want to win.
I thought the advert was an insult to the voter and if they/we take offence and stop voting then BB/C4/Endermol only have themselves to blame.
I thought the advert was an insult to the voter and if they/we take offence and stop voting then BB/C4/Endermol only have themselves to blame.
Shows how much they've learned in their ten nine years! 
If there had been no live feed last year, Rachel wouldn't have won.
Maybe that's why they have decided to drop the LF this year.
The HL show has never been a true reflection of exactly what goes on in that house.
Maybe that's why they have decided to drop the LF this year.
The HL show has never been a true reflection of exactly what goes on in that house.
quote:Originally posted by MysTerry:
If there had been no live feed last year, Rachel wouldn't have won.
Maybe that's why they have decided to drop the LF this year.
The HL show has never been a true reflection of exactly what goes on in that house.
Good point!
Very good pointquote:Originally posted by MysTerry:
If there had been no live feed last year, Rachel wouldn't have won.
Maybe that's why they have decided to drop the LF this year.
The HL show has never been a true reflection of exactly what goes on in that house.
I would rather they have people with a brain watch the show and not try and manipulate the viewers with the current misunderstanding and stupidity their current production team possesses.
Rachel was the height of entertainment wasn't she. 
if they dont want a boring winner, why did they manipulate the nominations knowing that the boring gang would put up two of the three HMs that have made this years BB. they must think that charlie is value for money, and rodrigos spasmodic toddler tantrums are entertainment.
Just watched the HL show then i take it.quote:Originally posted by Lil misz:
Rachel was the height of entertainment wasn't she.
Typical BB definition of entertainment.quote:Originally posted by mozart:
if they dont want a boring winner, why did they manipulate the nominations knowing that the boring gang would put up two of the three HMs that have made this years BB. they must think that charlie is value for money, and rodrigos spasmodic toddler tantrums are entertainment.
I think they were right!
Nope always had the LF on the way she was in the LF was no different to how she was portrayed in the HL's.quote:Originally posted by CaptVimes:Just watched the HL show then i take it.quote:Originally posted by Lil misz:
Rachel was the height of entertainment wasn't she.
rubbish, she was always positive always up for a task was OMG nice! and she WAS an actress in films and she DID do the half marathon and everything else they claimed she was fake about including being a teacher.quote:Originally posted by Lil misz:Nope always had the LF on the way she was in the LF was no different to how she was portrayed in the HL's.quote:Originally posted by CaptVimes:Just watched the HL show then i take it.quote:Originally posted by Lil misz:
Rachel was the height of entertainment wasn't she.
They fell upon the sword of paranoia.
Never said she wasnt positive or she was fake if I was voting for a friend I would picked up the phone and voted for her and when it came down to the final two I was glad it was her over Mikey.quote:Originally posted by CaptVimes:rubbish, she was always positive always up for a task was OMG nice! and she WAS an actress in films and she DID do the half marathon and everything else they claimed she was fake about including being a teacher.quote:Originally posted by Lil misz:Nope always had the LF on the way she was in the LF was no different to how she was portrayed in the HL's.quote:Originally posted by CaptVimes:Just watched the HL show then i take it.quote:Originally posted by Lil misz:
Rachel was the height of entertainment wasn't she.
They fell upon the sword of paranoia.
But as a HM she didnt do very much.
I still disagree she did as much as anyone else in there the editing left out a massive amount that she did. Mostly due to the nightly Luke and Becs no webecca nooooo! tits out antics every night.
I wanted Sara to win but got sick of the biased editing towards Rachel and they never once put them right on anything we had to find it out for ourselves that Rachel wasnt lying.
I wanted Sara to win but got sick of the biased editing towards Rachel and they never once put them right on anything we had to find it out for ourselves that Rachel wasnt lying.
I wanted Sara to win tooquote:Originally posted by CaptVimes:
I still disagree she did as much as anyone else in there the editing left out a massive amount that she did. Mostly due to the nightly Luke and Becs no webecca nooooo! tits out antics every night.
I wanted Sara to win but got sick of the biased editing towards Rachel and they never once put them right on anything we had to find it out for ourselves that Rachel wasnt lying.
now she was a great HM got abit of a bad edit from time to time but she was a newbie for some reason most newbs arnt shown as much
Anway back to Rachel she had some good moments I'll admit just think we could of had a better winner when most of the time she was just running round the garden eating grapes.
It was about justice.
I wish they'd get they're heads round that!
I wish they'd get they're heads round that!
You have great taste lil misz
I think if Sara hadnt got drawn into the dark side she would have been a great winner she should have been in from the beginning its really hard to come in that late.
Given what we had though i couldnt argue with Rachel, just aggravates me that C4 are still bristling that their pet HM didnt win after all they did to manipulate it.
I think if Sara hadnt got drawn into the dark side she would have been a great winner she should have been in from the beginning its really hard to come in that late.
Given what we had though i couldnt argue with Rachel, just aggravates me that C4 are still bristling that their pet HM didnt win after all they did to manipulate it.
I blame Darnell for Saras downfall she wanted to be friends he wanted more he started going on about "it suuucks" public felt sorry for him made her look like a nasty user bit like Noirin in that sense.quote:Originally posted by CaptVimes:
You have great taste lil misz
I think if Sara hadnt got drawn into the dark side she would have been a great winner she should have been in from the beginning its really hard to come in that late.
Given what we had though i couldnt argue with Rachel, just aggravates me that C4 are still bristling that their pet HM didnt win after all they did to manipulate it.
quote:Originally posted by CaptVimes:Nope but makes me all the more satisfied that it still hurts them like hell.quote:Originally posted by Aimee:
quote:Originally posted by Blizzie:
It was about justice.
I wish they'd get they're heads round that!
quote:Originally posted by Lil misz:
Rachel was the height of entertainment wasn't she.
She was a damn site better than Bex.
The idiots at channel 4 totally disregarded her win and made out as if Luke or Mario had won it !
they said vote out the boring ones but who are the boring ones?
not freddie or marcus and fredie went
bea? at the centre of too many arguements/manipulations
charlie? "funtime chas"
rodders? foil to chas
david? only lisa sidekick - boring!
sophie? - sophie who? just bitches occasionally - boring
lisa? smokes fags all day - boring
siavash? talks sense - dangerous for bb
so its marcus (although bb don't want him to win), charlie and bea for the final - thanks BB
not freddie or marcus and fredie went
bea? at the centre of too many arguements/manipulations
charlie? "funtime chas"
rodders? foil to chas
david? only lisa sidekick - boring!
sophie? - sophie who? just bitches occasionally - boring
lisa? smokes fags all day - boring
siavash? talks sense - dangerous for bb
so its marcus (although bb don't want him to win), charlie and bea for the final - thanks BB
BB seem to be mocking their own show - perhaps a case of getting in some defence before they get heavily criticised over the poor performance of the current series. Even Davina is making jokes about the viewing figures - and placing a slant on them improving, albeit very slightly in actual fact.