Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I agree iam still puzzling over it.
i think BB knew that lisa and co would target freddie and marcus if they block voted that way BB get rid of at least one of the pains in their arses. if bb had put marcus, freddie siavash and sophie up for their rule breaks, it almost certainly would have been sophie who would have gone, thats the only reason that i can see as to why BB let them discuss noms.
M
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
the only conclusion I have come too is that the vote to save last week have revealed Marcus, Freddie and Siavash are the front runners to win the show and as they have broken the rules on a number of occasions BB just dont want them to win,


oh I dont know what I am on about Confused
And that's a very reasonable conclusion.
And you shouldn't doubt yourself. Be strong in your convictions. Smiler
Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
quote:
Originally posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
the only conclusion I have come too is that the vote to save last week have revealed Marcus, Freddie and Siavash are the front runners to win the show and as they have broken the rules on a number of occasions BB just dont want them to win,


oh I dont know what I am on about Confused
And that's a very reasonable conclusion.
And you shouldn't doubt yourself. Be strong in your convictions. Smiler




rrrrr thanks Big Grin
Lockes
Those 3 were up to no good all week they basically nominated themselves.
I think the allowed to talk is to make them paranoid - you already saw Freddie's reaction, when charlie voted him and said he was voting someone else ... its to ignite reactions. this is the first time I have liked a BB punishment - it think it'll be a slow burner, playing in HMs minds over time.
SJ

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×