Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

They waste time now having two other guests speaking at the eviction interview. If they don't think McCall is good enough why don't they just replace her?

They have been showing us less and less of the nominations on the HLs too, even not giving out the reasons on their news stories. It's partly about controlling what the audience hears and sees.
Free Thinking
quote:
Originally posted by Free Thinking:
They waste time now having two other guests speaking at the eviction interview. If they don't think McCall is good enough why don't they just replace her?

They have been showing us less and less of the nominations on the HLs too, even not giving out the reasons on their news stories. It's partly about controlling what the audience hears and sees.

Agreed.
The evictee used to say so much more when it was just a one-on-one interview. Now they just sit there getting pointed at and analysed. Sleepy
Katerina
quote:
Originally posted by Katerina:
quote:
Originally posted by Free Thinking:
They waste time now having two other guests speaking at the eviction interview. If they don't think McCall is good enough why don't they just replace her?

They have been showing us less and less of the nominations on the HLs too, even not giving out the reasons on their news stories. It's partly about controlling what the audience hears and sees.

Agreed.
The evictee used to say so much more when it was just a one-on-one interview. Now they just sit there getting pointed at and analysed. Sleepy


Agree with both. I was fuming at Davina last night with so much time given and wasted to those two on the panel. The girl from Radio1 made some good points but instead of letting Noirin respond Davina went on to the psychologist who spouted a whole load of stuff.
They must go back to a one on one interview.

BBBM which follows is far better now at asking the evictee probing questions.
P

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×