Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by boink:
ok let me get this right lisa and charlie had the most nominations, and the newbies fail that means the newbies and Lisa with charlie faced the public vote! then the house mates that talked about nominations were up ! so lisa and Charles's nominations were canceled ? hows that work then? to be seen to be fair everyone including lisa a charle should be up! it looks more and more like bb wants lisa in there when the public dont! what a fix

There's a precedent for this, though: BB6.
When a number of the BB6 HMs were tricked into not nominating and therefore put forward for eviction, the "proper" nominations were set-aside. Kemal should have been included in the list of HMs facing the public vote, but wasn't.
Eugene's Lair
quote:
Originally posted by Eugene's Lair:
quote:
Originally posted by boink:
ok let me get this right lisa and charlie had the most nominations, and the newbies fail that means the newbies and Lisa with charlie faced the public vote! then the house mates that talked about nominations were up ! so lisa and Charles's nominations were canceled ? hows that work then? to be seen to be fair everyone including lisa a charle should be up! it looks more and more like bb wants lisa in there when the public dont! what a fix

There's a precedent for this, though: BB6.
When a number of the BB6 HMs were tricked into not nominating and therefore put forward for eviction, the "proper" nominations were set-aside. Kemal should have been included in the list of HMs facing the public vote, but wasn't.


i remember that the nominations were at 5 am or some stupid time and Craig Anthony and
Kemal or what ever his name was nominated but! the people they nominated were up along with those that did not nominate ! so the precedent is that those nominated along with those that dont nominate are up!
boink

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×