Skip to main content

I know this is a bit radical.. but wouldn't the last three weeks have been SO different if instead of being stuck with the HM's nominations, it was just a straight public vote every week with all HMs up for eviction?

Lisa and Sree would DEF have gone by now and the house dynamics would be completely different.

WE are the ones watching the programme, perhaps WE should get to choose WHO we want to see in the house. If things carry on as they are, the viewers will be forced to vote out all their favourites, leaving boring people that none of us want to watch!

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A vote to save each week would be good and would make them more money from the likes of me who only votes to save my faves if they are up. The downside is you might get stuck with the likes of Charley or Luke right to the end of a season as although disliked by most, they had quite strong support from those who found them 'entertaining' or 'big characters'
In fact this idea ticks so many of Endomols boxes, I wonder why they have'nt done it!
kimota
quote:
I know this is a bit radical.. but wouldn't the last three weeks have been SO different if instead of being stuck with the HM's nominations, it was just a straight public vote every week with all HMs up for eviction?

Lisa and Sree would DEF have gone by now and the house dynamics would be completely different.

WE are the ones watching the programme, perhaps WE should get to choose WHO we want to see in the house. If things carry on as they are, the viewers will be forced to vote out all their favourites, leaving boring people that none of us want to watch!


Iv'e said before - they should nominate two to be imune - the two with the highest are imune and all the rest go up for eviction. The only way they could 'fix' such a vote would be for all to receive two votes - in that case they all go up.
R

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×