Can't we just test different drugs and chemicals on her and other guilty nasty criminals, at least that would also keep the animal rights people happy as well.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
On who?
Actually I dont need an answer to that, course its against the law.....and why should nasty criminals get the good drugs for free anyway?quote:Originally posted by MoFo:
On who?
quote:Originally posted by Poolshark:
Can't we just test different drugs and chemicals on her and other guilty nasty criminals, at least that would also keep the animal rights people happy as well.
Don't know who "her" is but I thought the same thing years ago (about all sicko criminals)
The various governments have already did that over the years ,H bomb testing with just a "Turn away now" etc/Various stuff as regards Portadown etc...go google.
Karen Matthews
Huntley
The Yorkshire Ripper...
Huntley
The Yorkshire Ripper...
quote:Originally posted by The Devil In Diamante:
Karen Matthews
Huntley
The Yorkshire Ripper...
The evil swine who tortured baby Peter and raped that little girl
quote:Originally posted by Poolshark:
Can't we just test different drugs and chemicals on her and other guilty nasty criminals, at least that would also keep the animal rights people happy as well.
Unfortunately, it would be against their human rights but, imo, I think it is a very good idea
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before. 
*bites lip*
quote:Originally posted by MoFo:
On who?
Sorry I meant that Karen Matthews and all the other mothers and fathers who have let their kids die horrible deaths or even if the kids lived they may have been subjected to terrible lives, oh yea and rapists and other nasty people.
quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
And Sleazer.
quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
I think the idea is to test them on criminals.
I can understand the emotional feelings behind the question....
But my answer would definately be yes, it is against the law, and quite rightly so.
Hitler did his 'tests' on his prisoners....which he obviously gave valid (in his mind) reasons for doing it, to the people that carried out the 'tests'..
Not the way I want Clinical tests carried out..
But my answer would definately be yes, it is against the law, and quite rightly so.
Hitler did his 'tests' on his prisoners....which he obviously gave valid (in his mind) reasons for doing it, to the people that carried out the 'tests'..
Not the way I want Clinical tests carried out..
quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
And Sleazer.
quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
Uh-oh.
quote:Originally posted by Liverpoollass:quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
And Sleazer.
Oh and all blue eyed people.
quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
And Sleazer.
quote:Originally posted by Heather:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
I think the idea is to test them on criminals.
Hitler listed them as such.
quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Liverpoollass:quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
And Sleazer.
Oh and all blue eyed people.
That's me doomed...runs for the wire.
quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Liverpoollass:quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
And Sleazer.
Oh and all blue eyed people.
And people with noses
Politicians ? Bankers ?
At least then they'd be useful for something.
At least then they'd be useful for something.
quote:Originally posted by kattymieoww:quote:Originally posted by Heather:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
I think the idea is to test them on criminals.
Hitler listed them as such.
Oh apologies, I didn't realise we were talking about Hitler
quote:Originally posted by Heather:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
I think the idea is to test them on criminals.
Indeed. But the list up there is full of types of people a regime thought were sub-human in some way too. The human rights declaration was set up by the United Nations just after the war, in light of the atrocities and barbarism during the war, to try to stop that sort of thing happening again. It absolutely applies to all humans for being human. Including criminals and social deviants. That's the point of it.
quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
The human rights declaration was set up by the United Nations just after the war, in light of the atrocities and barbarism during the war, to try to stop that sort of thing happening again. It absolutely applies to all humans for being human. Including criminals and social deviants. That's the point of it.
quote:Originally posted by Poolshark:
Can't we just test different drugs and chemicals on ME and other guilty nasty criminals, at least that would also keep the animal rights people happy as well.
Da animals rights would like dat very much
quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
You forgot da arabs, all da racists want da arabs in dere too
quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:quote:Originally posted by Heather:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
I think the idea is to test them on criminals.
Indeed. But the list up there is full of types of people a regime thought were sub-human in some way too. The human rights declaration was set up by the United Nations just after the war, in light of the atrocities and barbarism during the war, to try to stop that sort of thing happening again. It absolutely applies to all humans for being human. Including criminals and social deviants. That's the point of it.
None of those rights exist in any real way anymore though, just term the target group "illegal combatants" and you can do pretty much anything you want.
quote:Originally posted by Comrade Ogilvy:
None of those rights exist in any real way anymore though, just term the target group "illegal combatants" and you can do pretty much anything you want.
Wryness aside, unlawful combatants are a Geneva Conventions issue. The fact that there was much condemnation from much of the West which has resulted in Guantanamo closing or being scheduled to close and created a political furore in the USA over the treatment of those unlawful combatants is testament to the effectiveness of the ideals.
The fact that the death sentence no longer exists in this country should be reason enough that this is never going to happen. Criminals are doing their time (even if I personally feel they should be punished in a way that doesn't involve just sitting around). Plus as a scientist I can't agree with putting a human life at risk unless I could be sure that the drug was then going to save others ( i work by the rule 100 animals for one human life, one human life for 100 human lives)
quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:quote:Originally posted by Moonbeams:quote:Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Maybe we could include gypsies, homosexuals, the disabled, and possibly jews in the list. It's not a bad idea actually, I'm surprised no-one has thought of it before.
And Sleazer.
You're not thinking of actually marketing that Anal Zing stuff are you?quote:Originally posted by Poolshark:
Can't we just test different drugs and chemicals on her and other guilty nasty criminals, at least that would also keep the animal rights people happy as well.
quote:Originally posted by Poolshark:quote:Originally posted by MoFo:
On who?
Sorry I meant that Karen Matthews and all the other mothers and fathers who have let their kids die horrible deaths or even if the kids lived they may have been subjected to terrible lives, oh yea and rapists and other nasty people.
Just for the sake of precision, can I point out that Karen Matthews didn't let a kid die. She's never getting nominated for mother of the year, but she didn't let her kid die.
quote:Originally posted by Ms Golightly:quote:Originally posted by Poolshark:quote:Originally posted by MoFo:
On who?
Sorry I meant that Karen Matthews and all the other mothers and fathers who have let their kids die horrible deaths or even if the kids lived they may have been subjected to terrible lives, oh yea and rapists and other nasty people.
Just for the sake of precision, can I point out that Karen Matthews didn't let a kid die. She's never getting nominated for mother of the year, but she didn't let her kid die.
I know she didn't kill her but she has sure messed up her head and her life!