The 7.9 mill she gets of the government each year is not enough she has been dipping in to her own reserves to the tune of 6 mill per year 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8124022.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8124022.stm
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Forum whipround?
She has a very large moat 
Don't we all..
quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Don't we all..
*hands Tupps cheque for 7.9mill and coutts cheque book*
quote:Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Don't we all..
*hands Tupps cheque for 7.9mill and coutts cheque book*
*runs to the nearest moat shop*
My heart bleeds...poor old hermaj...
Quit whining Queenie and flog a picture
quote:Originally posted by Kaytee:
Quit whining Queenie and flog a picture
She saves the floggings for the serfs
Bloody scrounger !!!
She should have her benefits cut altogether, cheeky moo.
She should have her benefits cut altogether, cheeky moo.
quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:quote:Originally posted by Kaytee:
Quit whining Queenie and flog a picture
She saves the floggings for the serfs
Some of them enjoy it
Sixty nine pence a year. Seems OK to me.
Perhaps a sensible solution would be to return all royal stuff currently in state hands, and then let her run her own affairs.
Perhaps a sensible solution would be to return all royal stuff currently in state hands, and then let her run her own affairs.
quote:Originally posted by Garage Joe:
Sixty nine pence a year. Seems OK to me.
Perhaps a sensible solution would be to return all royal stuff currently in state hands, and then let her run her own affairs.
OK then. Give Queenie a rise, but finance it by cutting the hangers on. Andrew's wedge for travel and his daughters' security could contribute a fair bit for a start
quote:Originally posted by Kaytee:quote:Originally posted by Garage Joe:
Sixty nine pence a year. Seems OK to me.
Perhaps a sensible solution would be to return all royal stuff currently in state hands, and then let her run her own affairs.
OK then. Give Queenie a rise, but finance it by cutting the hangers on. Andrew's wedge for travel and his daughters' security could contribute a fair bit for a start
I did not suggest that the Queen should have a rise.
However, at this point can I use my usual deflection gimmick, and say that I am more interested in top end tax affairs and expenses?
quote:Originally posted by Garage Joe:quote:Originally posted by Kaytee:quote:Originally posted by Garage Joe:
Sixty nine pence a year. Seems OK to me.
Perhaps a sensible solution would be to return all royal stuff currently in state hands, and then let her run her own affairs.
OK then. Give Queenie a rise, but finance it by cutting the hangers on. Andrew's wedge for travel and his daughters' security could contribute a fair bit for a start
I did not suggest that the Queen should have a rise.
However, at this point can I use my usual deflection gimmick, and say that I am more interested in top end tax affairs and expenses?
I'll go back to her flogging a picture then
Deflection succeeded
she could do a car boot?
quote:Originally posted by Gypsie:
she could do a car boot?
PMSL
At Stanley Gibbons 
quote:Originally posted by Kaytee:quote:Originally posted by Garage Joe:quote:Originally posted by Kaytee:quote:Originally posted by Garage Joe:
Sixty nine pence a year. Seems OK to me.
Perhaps a sensible solution would be to return all royal stuff currently in state hands, and then let her run her own affairs.
OK then. Give Queenie a rise, but finance it by cutting the hangers on. Andrew's wedge for travel and his daughters' security could contribute a fair bit for a start
I did not suggest that the Queen should have a rise.
However, at this point can I use my usual deflection gimmick, and say that I am more interested in top end tax affairs and expenses?
I'll go back to her flogging a picture then
Deflection succeeded
Which picture is she going to flog and will it be on ebay?
quote:Originally posted by Gypsie:
she could do a car boot?
...Not just any car boot sale but a Bentley car boot sale...
