Skip to main content

To me it does. When they go on all day about Freddie and Angel you know who they are all going to nominate. They don't need to even mension the word "nominations" and they can discuss it Shake Head Sree started his campaign early last night by going on about Marcus again Sleepy So that is Freddie v Marcus next week. Sree will then start talking about Siavash the week after and they will all nominate him. Is there any point having the rule no discussing noms in there? If they want it stopped they have to stop HMs from any bitching or talking about other HMs

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Of course bitching can influence noms, particularly when it comes from an influential hm. This is within the rules though and I have notseen any attempt at blatant attempts at vote fixing. usually there is no need to do this anyway as likeminded types tend to become close and see things in a similar way. People are hardly going to vote out those they are closest too unless they have a big row and usually there are one or two people who are liked least by the majority.
kimota
i said on another thread to me its influencing nominations ! its funny that 4 or 5 of those who sat bitching about angel and freddie then went and nominated both angel and freddie for the same reasons! surely at least one of them would have had a different reason for nominating at least one of them? but no it was the same reason for in every case !
boink
quote:
Originally posted by boink:
i said on another thread to me its influencing nominations ! its funny that 4 or 5 of those who sat bitching about angel and freddie then went and nominated both angel and freddie for the same reasons! surely at least one of them would have had a different reason for nominating at least one of them? but no it was the same reason for in every case !



Agreed Boink Thumbs Up
Kaytee

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×