To me it does. When they go on all day about Freddie and Angel you know who they are all going to nominate. They don't need to even mension the word "nominations" and they can discuss it Sree started his campaign early last night by going on about Marcus again So that is Freddie v Marcus next week. Sree will then start talking about Siavash the week after and they will all nominate him. Is there any point having the rule no discussing noms in there? If they want it stopped they have to stop HMs from any bitching or talking about other HMs
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
The rule regarding not being able to discuss nominations, seems to have disappeared this year.
Former Member
it's not Marcus V Freddie this week though, but the same applies with Angel. They sit around in their 'group' and bitch about them. Lo and behold they are up for eviction.
Strange how Kris and Dogface had the same nominations and the same reasons.
Strange how Kris and Dogface had the same nominations and the same reasons.
quote:Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
The rule regarding not being able to discuss nominations, seems to have disappeared this year.
on the highlights sree was blatently discussing noms with karly and a few others
Of course bitching can influence noms, particularly when it comes from an influential hm. This is within the rules though and I have notseen any attempt at blatant attempts at vote fixing. usually there is no need to do this anyway as likeminded types tend to become close and see things in a similar way. People are hardly going to vote out those they are closest too unless they have a big row and usually there are one or two people who are liked least by the majority.
i said on another thread to me its influencing nominations ! its funny that 4 or 5 of those who sat bitching about angel and freddie then went and nominated both angel and freddie for the same reasons! surely at least one of them would have had a different reason for nominating at least one of them? but no it was the same reason for in every case !
I agree and very good points made in this thread.
If bb are not going to punish them they might as well put the whole house up ever week.
It's getting pathetic now.
It's getting pathetic now.
of course the bitching is influencing noms...but they have formed their alliances and unfortunatly thats just the way it is
good idea wilder, just put them up every week, it's so blatent and with NO LF. bb haven't got any interest in rules/noms - just like last year.
what they supposed to do then stop bloody talking fgs. great show that would make
quote:Originally posted by who is she:
what they supposed to do then stop bloody talking fgs. great show that would make
that's a good idea as well
i think it's more, they are of limited conversation. one of the main things that seem to keep them chatting is who and what they are dissing.
quote:Originally posted by who is she:
what they supposed to do then stop bloody talking fgs. great show that would make
I like that idea. No more listening to Sree going on about marcus or Kris going on about freddie. Im sure BB will hit 10m viewers with that
quote:Originally posted by boink:
i said on another thread to me its influencing nominations ! its funny that 4 or 5 of those who sat bitching about angel and freddie then went and nominated both angel and freddie for the same reasons! surely at least one of them would have had a different reason for nominating at least one of them? but no it was the same reason for in every case !
Agreed Boink
I wouldn't be surprised if they are given an hour off to discuss nominations, last night several of the noms were repeated word for word almost like they had planned what they were going to say, the people involved, Kris, Dogface and Karly etc should have been instantly put up for eviction.
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
245 online (7 members
/
238 guests),
0 chatting