He always reminds me that it's not just me who thinks the media has gone to hell in a handcart. I'm genuinely sorry MJ has died and the event is certainly newsworthy. But Jeez let's get some perspective here. There are really bad things happening in the world which actually could affect our lives and nobody seems to give a stuff about it.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
is he writing any columns at the mo? BB always gets a mention when he does.
quote:Originally posted by electric shepherd:
is he writing any columns at the mo? BB always gets a mention when he does.
The last Screeburn column I saw was on 13th June. He did mention BB.
He was one of the writers of the Big Brother/Zombie programme...can't remember what it was called now
quote:Originally posted by madgey:
He was one of the writers of the Big Brother/Zombie programme...can't remember what it was called now
Dead Set. He was THE writer.
memory isn't my strong point!quote:Originally posted by Queen of the High Teas:quote:Originally posted by madgey:
He was one of the writers of the Big Brother/Zombie programme...can't remember what it was called now
Dead Set. He was THE writer.
have had to switch the news off, I sort of know the words they are going to say, they imprinted in my head they repeating so much
quote:Originally posted by madgey:memory isn't my strong point!quote:Originally posted by Queen of the High Teas:quote:Originally posted by madgey:
He was one of the writers of the Big Brother/Zombie programme...can't remember what it was called now
Dead Set. He was THE writer.
Former Member
Whatever your personal feelings about MJ, yuo can't deny that the man was a legend. You can avoid listening to the programmes or watching them if you wish.
How many hundreds of threads were there about Jade dying? At least MJ was a global sensation.
How many hundreds of threads were there about Jade dying? At least MJ was a global sensation.
quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
have had to switch the news off, I sort of know the words they are going to say, they imprinted in my head they repeating so much
It's just ridiculous. He did a piece on the media hysteria over Jade's death and showed the way the media has developed the strategy since the hysteria over Diana's death. I find the whole thing ghoulish and very uncomfortable. But then I find the whole culture of celeb magazines generally ghoulish and uncomfortable.
quote:Originally posted by Suzi-Q:
Whatever your personal feelings about MJ, yuo can't deny that the man was a legend. You can avoid listening to the programmes or watching them if you wish.
How many hundreds of threads were there about Jade dying? At least MJ was a global sensation.
Err, I didn't deny he was a legend. I said that his death was sad and newsworthy. Just not worthy of the kind of media saturation that we will now be bombarded with. I think that there are very few people who's death is worthy of the sort of saturated coverage the media insist on giving us now tbh.
I watched it, someone posted to watch on here, very good programme will have to look out for it in future.quote:Originally posted by Queen of the High Teas:quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
have had to switch the news off, I sort of know the words they are going to say, they imprinted in my head they repeating so much
It's just ridiculous. He did a piece on the media hysteria over Jade's death and showed the way the media has developed the strategy since the hysteria over Diana's death. I find the whole thing ghoulish and very uncomfortable. But then I find the whole culture of celeb magazines generally ghoulish and uncomfortable.
Not Charlie Brooker but a pretty rational look at the coverage.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm...n/26/michael-jackson
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm...n/26/michael-jackson
I think a lot of the media are struggling to find their tone at the moment as it happened so quickly.
quote:Originally posted by Queen of the High Teas:
Not Charlie Brooker but a pretty rational look at the coverage.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm...n/26/michael-jackson
Probably a bit of escapism, but otherwise a gift that keeps on giving.
Some can go along with and write about the hysteria and hyperbole.
Others can object to and write about the hysteria and hyperbole.
Whatever! No need to search for stories this week, a good time for journalists. IMHYCO.
quote:Originally posted by Suzi-Q:
Whatever your personal feelings about MJ, yuo can't deny that the man was a legend. You can avoid listening to the programmes or watching them if you wish.
How many hundreds of threads were there about Jade dying? At least MJ was a global sensation.
I agree, he's barely been dead 24 hrs. Why shouldn't that dominate the news coverage today. It will soon calm down.
quote:Originally posted by Queen of the High Teas:
He always reminds me that it's not just me who thinks the media has gone to hell in a handcart. I'm genuinely sorry MJ has died and the event is certainly newsworthy. But Jeez let's get some perspective here. There are really bad things happening in the world which actually could affect our lives and nobody seems to give a stuff about it.
i think people do care queenie-well I know I do
i suppose its cos MJ is/was a global name that everyone recognises and theres always been media interest in him-he's been in the public eye for over 40 years, so its only natural people are interested
dont shout at me hormonal lady
quote:Originally posted by china:quote:Originally posted by Queen of the High Teas:
He always reminds me that it's not just me who thinks the media has gone to hell in a handcart. I'm genuinely sorry MJ has died and the event is certainly newsworthy. But Jeez let's get some perspective here. There are really bad things happening in the world which actually could affect our lives and nobody seems to give a stuff about it.
i think people do care queenie-well I know I do
i suppose its cos MJ is/was a global name that everyone recognises and theres always been media interest in him-he's been in the public eye for over 40 years, so its only natural people are interested
dont shout at me hormonal lady
Lol, I won't shout at you China. This time.
I'm not suggesting the story shouldn't be covered, or even given prominence, but I'm not sure what it achieves to keep wheeling out Uri Geller and other Z listers (Mark Lester from Oliver anyone?!) to give us their opinion on his death. The media don't know what to do with the story, one the one hand he was a musical legend, on the other hand he was a tabloid oddbod that, lets be honest, had a pretty questionable lifestyle towards the end. I think it's terribly sad that he's died. I don't believe he could have been a happy man. But I watched the news earlier where they were stopping kids in the street and asking them how they felt about his death. Most of the people wouldn't even have been born when he was at his peak. By all means cover the story. By all means pay tribute to the man and his music. By all means raise the questions of his life. But a bit more thought and moderation should go into how that's done. I don't see why we need the opinions of nobodies to validate how we feel about Michael Jackson's life or death. The top four headlines on Teletex at the moment are about MJ, depite having a separate special. The second story is about how upset Serena Williams is about it all. The killing of a two year old is the fifth headline. No mention of the situation in Iran. I understand that many, (including myself to be fair) will feel that it is justified to give the MJ story prominence, but how in the name of all that is holy does Serena Williams' grief take precedent over a two year old's murder?
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
335 online (4 members
/
331 guests),
0 chatting