Year after year, we see housemates guessing at what may happen, who they think will be evicted.
We have seen and heard their reasoning for their (and others) actions.
Yet they are so often wrong.
Then, after eviction they are amazed that the viewers saw it differently.
For example:
Cairon has just said if he is not liked by the viewers it may be because of his clash/argument with Sree.
No mention, or awareness of any other thing which viewers may not like. Just that one row.
Does that mean that in his head there is only one thing of which the viewers may disapprove?
Why don`t they see what viewers see?
Why don`t they analyse more accurately?
Viewers and housemates views are so different.
We have seen and heard their reasoning for their (and others) actions.
Yet they are so often wrong.
Then, after eviction they are amazed that the viewers saw it differently.
For example:
Cairon has just said if he is not liked by the viewers it may be because of his clash/argument with Sree.
No mention, or awareness of any other thing which viewers may not like. Just that one row.
Does that mean that in his head there is only one thing of which the viewers may disapprove?
Why don`t they see what viewers see?
Why don`t they analyse more accurately?
Viewers and housemates views are so different.