Why is Rodrigo apparently so highly rated as a potential winner, but hasn't even had a Fan thread... or Wanker thread for that matter... on this forum?
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
i wouldnt have a clue, i personally think he is another waste of space, with his stupid little temper tantrums he should have auditioned for the tiny House for terrors or brat camp.
Rodrigo lovely.
That twat should of been gone weeks ago.
The final should of been Siavash, Marcus, Freddie, Tom and Angel.
Best HMs Others would of been knocked out the game in a 1v1 eviction.
The final should of been Siavash, Marcus, Freddie, Tom and Angel.
Best HMs Others would of been knocked out the game in a 1v1 eviction.
Rodrigo is an annoying Brat
I prefer Rod' to Charlie or David!
quote:Originally posted by WILDER X:
Rodrigo lovely.
Ah ha! I see from your sig there is a Roddy fan club... not been busy then?
quote:Originally posted by figtree:
I prefer Rod' to Charlie or David!
Faint praise though...
quote:Originally posted by Baz:
Rodrigo is great *check the sig*
I refer you to my post above yours then M'lud!
He seems to be liked outside of the forum but dont think he has a big enough fan base to win but I love him and I am not a teeny bopper
Wanker. Case closed
I am voting big ime for himquote:Originally posted by Marguerita:
He seems to be liked outside of the forum but dont think he has a big enough fan base to win but I love him and I am not a teeny bopper
quote:Originally posted by carotino:
Wanker. Case closed
He might appeal
quote:I am voting big ime for him
Me too. lol.
Rodrigo got to beat charlie.
quote:Originally posted by WILDER X:quote:I am voting big ime for him
Me too. lol.
Rodrigo got to beat charlie.
quote:Originally posted by WILDER X:quote:I am voting big ime for him
Me too. lol.
Rodrigo got to beat charlie.
Can we all have a go at beating Charlie?
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
1,177 online (3 members
/
1,174 guests),
0 chatting