You and that Div Divina don't like Siavash! 
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by monkey13:
You and that Div Divina don't like Siavash!
I do not get that impression.
I think the only thing that Davina said was if she has worked hard to get into the house and someone decided not to nominate and get her up she would be mad, and i dont blame her. Lisa was too busy fighting off McCririck to say anything!
I've lost count on how many times Davina and George Lamb have almost dismissed him on their BBLB and BBBM shows, last week and this.
Particularly Divina, every time his name is mentioned, she shoots him down. I'm not sure who they have in their audiences on BBBM but the do not represent the real fans opinions on any of the HM's.
She is so unprofessional. I'll be dammed if I'm going to be told who I should and shouldn't vote for just because BB want a certain HM to win.
They could of picked any other episode to re-enact, but they just had to pin point Siavash and humiliate him and then ridicule him by saying he's playing the victim and trying to gain sympathy...
Particularly Divina, every time his name is mentioned, she shoots him down. I'm not sure who they have in their audiences on BBBM but the do not represent the real fans opinions on any of the HM's.
She is so unprofessional. I'll be dammed if I'm going to be told who I should and shouldn't vote for just because BB want a certain HM to win.
They could of picked any other episode to re-enact, but they just had to pin point Siavash and humiliate him and then ridicule him by saying he's playing the victim and trying to gain sympathy...
quote:Originally posted by luxor:quote:Originally posted by monkey13:
You and that Div Divina don't like Siavash!
I do not get that impression.
when have any other housemates had a task designed around them in the final week, last night in Lisa's interview Davina mentioned that Siavash nominated Lisa six times, no mention of Lisa nominating Marcus 9 times? Yes I am a Siavash supporter, but I also like fair and unbiased editing and tasks/challenges. We've had none of that this year, no wonder the shows gone down the pan, production rubbish, tasks rubbish, no live feed rubbish and top it all Davina was utter crap and then slagging Siavash off on twitter.
Oh and now highlights tonight we'll have the reapeat of episode 50 yet again, talk about flogging a dead horse!
I dont think they do like Siavash, or why dont they show some embarrassing footage of how Sophie tossed Kris under the covers, or Charlie and Roddrigo getting fruity.
quote:Originally posted by wonder:
I dont think they do like Siavash, or why dont they show some embarrassing footage of how Sophie tossed Kris under the covers, or Charlie and Roddrigo getting fruity.
Wouldn't have been so bad if they had done a night of everyone, but tonight will be the third night in a row for Siavash, very unfair. Since BB4 and the utter shambles that turned out to be this has continually happened with the editing and been more evident as it's gone on, reality show my ar*e.
Well, they tried the same tactics with Rachel last year, and it backfired spectacularly on them 
quote:Originally posted by cinnamon girl:
Well, they tried the same tactics with Rachel last year, and it backfired spectacularly on them
Hope it does this year, just to piss them off
quote:Originally posted by Dame_Ann_Average:quote:Originally posted by cinnamon girl:
Well, they tried the same tactics with Rachel last year, and it backfired spectacularly on them
Hope it does this year, just to piss them off
Here here! It would serve them right!
quote:Siavash nominated Lisa six times, no mention of Lisa nominating Marcus 9 times
Great point!
She's doing Endemol's dirty work. Thier chosen ones are Rodrigo and Charlie, possibly Sophie. They didn't think Siavash would have lasted so long or be so popular.
So Davina and George will say pretty much anything to discredit him.
BB are happy to reinforce his betrayal of his girlfriend, let's face it, it's all they've got. He's a good guy that stood up to Lisa in his own unconfrontational way, he refused to nom, he outsmarted her(Not difficult) and outsmarted BB.
He stood up for Freddie, when everyone else didn't give a damn.
They have tried to paint him as a selfish major player, a liar and an attention seeker.
Remember they were furious Rachel won last year, and are still having digs at her now. Think Aiseleyne, they hated her too.
So Davina and George will say pretty much anything to discredit him.
BB are happy to reinforce his betrayal of his girlfriend, let's face it, it's all they've got. He's a good guy that stood up to Lisa in his own unconfrontational way, he refused to nom, he outsmarted her(Not difficult) and outsmarted BB.
He stood up for Freddie, when everyone else didn't give a damn.
They have tried to paint him as a selfish major player, a liar and an attention seeker.
Remember they were furious Rachel won last year, and are still having digs at her now. Think Aiseleyne, they hated her too.
quote:Originally posted by Senora Reyes:
She's doing Endemol's dirty work. Thier chosen ones are Rodrigo and Charlie, possibly Sophie. They didn't think Siavash would have lasted so long or be so popular.
So Davina and George will say pretty much anything to discredit him.
BB are happy to reinforce his betrayal of his girlfriend, let's face it, it's all they've got. He's a good guy that stood up to Lisa in his own unconfrontational way, he refused to nom, he outsmarted her(Not difficult) and outsmarted BB.
He stood up for Freddie, when everyone else didn't give a damn.
They have tried to paint him as a selfish major player, a liar and an attention seeker.
Remember they were furious Rachel won last year, and are still having digs at her now. Think Aiseleyne, they hated her too.
The sad thing is Senora I know your right..
I spent most of yesterday looking forward to an eviction night and seeing one of the HM's that I most dislike getting the boot.
Although that happened I just couldn't believe the way in which the interview and after eviction discussions were done..I think I spent half an hour with my mouth open in shock.
To top it off they are doing their level best to discredit Siavash..Why don't they leave that dicision up to us, the fans? We've watched for 3 months, don't we have the right to come to our own conclusions?
How are they discrediting him?
Is it not he who made an arse of himself over Noirin. Is it not he who went totally OTT with his childish actions over it being shown.
It is not like they showed anything that was untrue.
He is the one digging the hole, he just does not know when to stop.
Is it not he who made an arse of himself over Noirin. Is it not he who went totally OTT with his childish actions over it being shown.
It is not like they showed anything that was untrue.
He is the one digging the hole, he just does not know when to stop.
surely if he has taken himself out of the game. . and with doing that can't and shouldn't win (his words not mine) they can do what the hell they want with the NON house-mate.. 
quote:surely if he has taken himself out of the game. . and with doing that can't and shouldn't win (his words not mine) they can do what the hell they want with the NON house-mate..
I think that BB & Siavahs are paying back Siavash for his decision to not vote - if they let him get away with it, next years' HMs will try the same thing.
I think it likely that they are not doing the same thing to Sophie because they think she has been led astray.
This is a copy of a post from DS that sums it up perfectly..
The reason for the kid gloves Lisa interview!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's obvious that for quite a while Endemol has been setting up either Charlie or Sophie as the winner of this series. They cannot now possibly allow Siavash to win due to the fact that this will set a precedent for the final series that will be impossible for the producers to deal with, just as they have failed to deal with it this series. By restricting the odious Lisa's interview to the relationship between her and David and the outing to London (which would have been equally good value had just about anyone else done it), Endemol have ensured that no mention was made of Lisa and her gang's block voting and marginalisation of the smaller group in the first 2 months of the show. Because, of course, who were thick as thieves with Lisa at that point and were nothing more than two of her little minions??? Why, Charlie and Sophie, of course. So no way could they allow any reference to that period during the eviction show. They even lined up a couple of utterly non-combatative panel members. Utterly pathetic and even MORE reason to vote Siavash to win!
The reason for the kid gloves Lisa interview!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's obvious that for quite a while Endemol has been setting up either Charlie or Sophie as the winner of this series. They cannot now possibly allow Siavash to win due to the fact that this will set a precedent for the final series that will be impossible for the producers to deal with, just as they have failed to deal with it this series. By restricting the odious Lisa's interview to the relationship between her and David and the outing to London (which would have been equally good value had just about anyone else done it), Endemol have ensured that no mention was made of Lisa and her gang's block voting and marginalisation of the smaller group in the first 2 months of the show. Because, of course, who were thick as thieves with Lisa at that point and were nothing more than two of her little minions??? Why, Charlie and Sophie, of course. So no way could they allow any reference to that period during the eviction show. They even lined up a couple of utterly non-combatative panel members. Utterly pathetic and even MORE reason to vote Siavash to win!
quote:Originally posted by Blackpudlian:quote:surely if he has taken himself out of the game. . and with doing that can't and shouldn't win (his words not mine) they can do what the hell they want with the NON house-mate..
I think that BB & Siavahs are paying back Siavash for his decision to not vote - if they let him get away with it, next years' HMs will try the same thing.
I think it likely that they are not doing the same thing to Sophie because they think she has been led astray.
Then they should of punished him then, not now
quote:Originally posted by monkey13:quote:Originally posted by Blackpudlian:quote:surely if he has taken himself out of the game. . and with doing that can't and shouldn't win (his words not mine) they can do what the hell they want with the NON house-mate..
I think that BB & Siavahs are paying back Siavash for his decision to not vote - if they let him get away with it, next years' HMs will try the same thing.
I think it likely that they are not doing the same thing to Sophie because they think she has been led astray.
Then they should of punished him then, not now
Like they should have punished the block-voters way back then. It was obvious what was happening.
If BB condoned the consistent breaking of one fundamental rule of the nomination system throughout the series what right have they to punish Siavash for breaking another aspect of it?
quote:Originally posted by riversider:quote:Originally posted by monkey13:quote:Originally posted by Blackpudlian:quote:surely if he has taken himself out of the game. . and with doing that can't and shouldn't win (his words not mine) they can do what the hell they want with the NON house-mate..
I think that BB & Siavahs are paying back Siavash for his decision to not vote - if they let him get away with it, next years' HMs will try the same thing.
I think it likely that they are not doing the same thing to Sophie because they think she has been led astray.
Then they should of punished him then, not now
Like they should have punished the block-voters way back then. It was obvious what was happening.
If BB condoned the consistent breaking of one fundamental rule of the nomination system throughout the series what right have they to punish Siavash for breaking another aspect of it?
quote:Originally posted by riversider:quote:Originally posted by monkey13:quote:Originally posted by Blackpudlian:quote:surely if he has taken himself out of the game. . and with doing that can't and shouldn't win (his words not mine) they can do what the hell they want with the NON house-mate..
I think that BB & Siavahs are paying back Siavash for his decision to not vote - if they let him get away with it, next years' HMs will try the same thing.
I think it likely that they are not doing the same thing to Sophie because they think she has been led astray.
Then they should of punished him then, not now
Like they should have punished the block-voters way back then. It was obvious what was happening.
If BB condoned the consistent breaking of one fundamental rule of the nomination system throughout the series what right have they to punish Siavash for breaking another aspect of it?
Spot on.
When BB allowed nomination chat, they discredited any integrity of their nomination system. Anything that happened after that point was fair game.
quote:Originally posted by riversider:
Like they should have punished the block-voters way back then. It was obvious what was happening.
If BB condoned the consistent breaking of one fundamental rule of the nomination system throughout the series what right have they to punish Siavash for breaking another aspect of it?
Great point!
quote:Originally posted by ŅÏÎđâŅŅОÏηКŅÎģ:
When BB allowed nomination chat, they discredited any integrity of their nomination system. Anything that happened after that point was fair game.
I think Charlie, Sophie and Rodrigo are BB supposed favs because they are the Hollyoaks housemates you know with good looks, C4 aims most of their programmes towards the younger audience so they know that they would be a good representation than the likes of Siavash, David or any of the other housemates that have gone. They're probably favourites with some teens but not this one 
.
Siavash getting bad edits because clearly BB don't want him to win and have to keep bringing up what happened with Noirin which he regrets, we all make mistakes but it seems like they keep rubbing it in
.
. Siavash getting bad edits because clearly BB don't want him to win and have to keep bringing up what happened with Noirin which he regrets, we all make mistakes but it seems like they keep rubbing it in
.
Can see were she is coming from there he plays in safety in numbers cant do anything by himselfquote:Originally posted by Skylark24:
I think the only thing that Davina said was if she has worked hard to get into the house and someone decided not to nominate and get her up she would be mad, and i dont blame her. Lisa was too busy fighting off McCririck to say anything!
