What purpose would it serve really?
Give past examples maybe..
Give past examples maybe..
Replies sorted oldest to newest
BB CLEARLY helped in every way they could in getting Pete and Nadia to win.
And no one can prove otherwise.
And no one can prove otherwise.
They like a winner to go on and promote BB,Rachel didn't she went back to her life as did Cameron,BB don't like that.They much prefer the Anfony's,Brian Belo's to go on to win and keep BB brand rolling until the following year.
They aren't trying to make someone win...they are trying to force the public to vote out the person that BB don't want to win.
Simply done by only showing the worst possible character/personality traits of a HM.
Simply done by only showing the worst possible character/personality traits of a HM.
quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
BB CLEARLY helped in every way they could in getting Pete and Nadia to win.
And no one can prove otherwise.
Or other-otherwise no?
I suppose they think they can see which HM has the longest shelf life, ergo a walking BB advert.
quote:Originally posted by MysTerry:
They aren't trying to make someone win...they are trying to force the public to vote out the person that BB don't want to win.
Simply done by only showing the worst possible character/personality traits of a HM.
Isnt that the whole idea?
In this case I think they thought they would be getting a downmarket Brian Dowling in Charlie, hoping that lightning would strike twice in terms of positive media coverage, but they've found themselves landed with a downmarket Brian Belo, if that were possible.
quote:Originally posted by erinp:
They like a winner to go on and promote BB,Rachel didn't she went back to her life as did Cameron,BB don't like that.They much prefer the Anfony's,Brian Belo's to go on to win and keep BB brand rolling until the following year.
Tell me how Cameron did that? And other than Cameron name another, 1 even.
quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
BB CLEARLY helped in every way they could in getting Pete and Nadia to win.
And no one can prove otherwise.
Or other-otherwise no?
Every year BB see one or possibly two HM's that can be big news for them for positive reasons and then give those HM's every advantage in the good editing, it's a well known fact.
Add to that Davina bigging up Charlie every fecking chance she gets, it's quite vomit making.
Oh I dunno, this thread reeks of Bush ordering 911 to me.. 
quote:Originally posted by captain marbles:
In this case I think they thought they would be getting a downmarket Brian Dowling in Charlie, hoping that lightning would strike twice in terms of positive media coverage, but they've found themselves landed with a downmarket Brian Belo, if that were possible.
The very existence of Charlie proves it is
They might put a big wedge on in the bookies at the start.... 
quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
BB CLEARLY helped in every way they could in getting Pete and Nadia to win.
And no one can prove otherwise.
Or other-otherwise no?
Every year BB see one or possibly two HM's that can be big news for them for positive reasons and then give those HM's every advantage in the good editing, it's a well known fact.
Add to that Davina bigging up Charlie every fecking chance she gets, it's quite vomit making.
Big news? Where VS? On sky, bbc maybe, hmm the daily mail maybe for a morning possibly/. Cmon mate you can suggest better surely?
After BB Cameron went home ,the end.BB want winners to be playing the scene,going to night clubs ,doing mag deals,staying in the limelight,getting papped.Cameron/Rachel did not play that game.My opinion.quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by erinp:
They like a winner to go on and promote BB,Rachel didn't she went back to her life as did Cameron,BB don't like that.They much prefer the Anfony's,Brian Belo's to go on to win and keep BB brand rolling until the following year.
Tell me how Cameron did that? And other than Cameron name another, 1 even.
quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
BB CLEARLY helped in every way they could in getting Pete and Nadia to win.
And no one can prove otherwise.
Or other-otherwise no?
Every year BB see one or possibly two HM's that can be big news for them for positive reasons and then give those HM's every advantage in the good editing, it's a well known fact.
Add to that Davina bigging up Charlie every fecking chance she gets, it's quite vomit making.
Big news? Where VS? On sky, bbc maybe, hmm the daily mail maybe for a morning possibly/. Cmon mate you can suggest better surely?
Just use your common sense, look at the HL shows, see which HM's get an easier ride than others...it's clear to see.
quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by MysTerry:
They aren't trying to make someone win...they are trying to force the public to vote out the person that BB don't want to win.
Simply done by only showing the worst possible character/personality traits of a HM.
Isnt that the whole idea?
Any die hard fan of BB wants fair and unbiased editing, we've not had that since BB3! Live feed can put a whole different meaning on something that's shown on the highlights show. BB need or want someone who they deem fit to win, although their choice of winners is not usually what the public wants. Same as with the housemates, they've not listened to what the viewers have wanted for year, they have effectivly killed the show off with their idiotic ways, bad judgement and toally shit coverage of this year.
quote:Originally posted by stonks:
They might put a big wedge on in the bookies at the start....
The most insightful answer so far
Very true.quote:Originally posted by riversider:quote:Originally posted by captain marbles:
In this case I think they thought they would be getting a downmarket Brian Dowling in Charlie, hoping that lightning would strike twice in terms of positive media coverage, but they've found themselves landed with a downmarket Brian Belo, if that were possible.
The very existence of Charlie proves it is
quote:Originally posted by erinp:After BB Cameron went home ,the end.BB want winners to be playing the scene,going to night clubs ,doing mag deals,staying in the limelight,getting papped.Cameron/Rachel did not play that game.My opinion.quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by erinp:
They like a winner to go on and promote BB,Rachel didn't she went back to her life as did Cameron,BB don't like that.They much prefer the Anfony's,Brian Belo's to go on to win and keep BB brand rolling until the following year.
Tell me how Cameron did that? And other than Cameron name another, 1 even.
Interesting erinP. So you approve of the suggestion?
Irish? You need to be on the PROC youre a good poster..
quote:Originally posted by stonks:
They might put a big wedge on in the bookies at the start....
Those conniving edit-suite apprentices... devilish
quote:Originally posted by erinp:.....After BB Cameron went home ,the end.BB want winners to be playing the scene,going to night clubs ,doing mag deals,staying in the limelight,getting papped.Cameron/Rachel did not play that game.My opinion.
I agree Erinp, BUT surely Siavash fits that mould and BB are giving him a really bad edit
BB desperately wanted Nikki to win, so much so, they put her back in ! but Live feed prevented them getting rid of Aisleyne that year.
BB want characters like Brian Belo, Nikki, Luke and Bex to win.
BB want characters like Brian Belo, Nikki, Luke and Bex to win.
Simply answering your question.quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by erinp:After BB Cameron went home ,the end.BB want winners to be playing the scene,going to night clubs ,doing mag deals,staying in the limelight,getting papped.Cameron/Rachel did not play that game.My opinion.quote:Originally posted by Butter$:quote:Originally posted by erinp:
They like a winner to go on and promote BB,Rachel didn't she went back to her life as did Cameron,BB don't like that.They much prefer the Anfony's,Brian Belo's to go on to win and keep BB brand rolling until the following year.
Tell me how Cameron did that? And other than Cameron name another, 1 even.
Interesting erinP. So you approve of the suggestion?
Irish? You need to be on the PROC youre a good poster..
Do I approve that BB do this ...NO
Did you even read the thread? (all of it)
quote:Originally posted by Butter$:
What purpose would it serve really?
Give past examples maybe..
Telephone votes.. money ..simples..
quote:Originally posted by lightfoot:quote:Originally posted by Butter$:
What purpose would it serve really?
Give past examples maybe..
Telephone votes.. money ..simples..
Emm not so it seems...
What purpose would it serve..answeredquote:Originally posted by Butter$:
Did you even read the thread? (all of it)
Examples..Answered
