I hate it when BB do that as i think half the voters get it wrong when they do that, IE not realise and vote for one out but end up saving that person.. what do you think folks? if BB do that i won't vote at all myself..
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Ever since we chucked out their fave Nikki, they've avoided putting them all up on a vote to evict.
Meh! Vote to evict, vote to save. Either way Lisa is most likely to go. I'm pretty sure Charlie wouldn't go on a vote to evict any how.
bb will have to do something imo. maybe nominate on their behalf by default?
quote:Originally posted by vrmaryport:
bb will have to do something imo. maybe nominate on their behalf by default?
Or put up everyone who refused to vote, leaving David the only one immune.
Well, I could cope with that - just.
As BB have made a point by having nominations and an eviction on Tuesday I think they have to go with that point and make it vote to evict no matter who`s up. The lines will then open for vote to save, it`s defeating the issue if they go for vote to save on Tuesday after having gone against tradition by holding nominations in the final week.quote:Originally posted by brisket:
Well, I could cope with that - just.
Just let Charlie be up one way or the other please, he must be absolutely terrified now he hasn`t nominated and others have
Depends how many are up. If their are only two then on this occasion it won't matter MUCH, which way round the vote is.quote:Originally posted by forgetmenot:
I hate it when BB do that as i think half the voters get it wrong when they do that, IE not realise and vote for one out but end up saving that person.. what do you think folks? if BB do that i won't vote at all myself..