I think it was a moment of realisation. Something that the other housemates haven't had yet. Namely that Charlie is a two faced little shit.

What good would saying it to his face be? Sure you can call him a wimp for not confronting Charlie but what good would it have done? Everyone else thinks the sun shines out of Charlie's arse so Siavash would find himself in a situation where it's him against the house again but nothing would have been achieved.

quote:

What good would saying it to his face be?

Could Siavash be certain he was speaking to the correct face?

At least Charlie nominated.

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
I think it was a moment of realisation. Something that the other housemates haven't had yet. Namely that Charlie is a two faced little shit.

What good would saying it to his face be? Sure you can call him a wimp for not confronting Charlie but what good would it have done? Everyone else thinks the sun shines out of Charlie's arse so Siavash would find himself in a situation where it's him against the house again but nothing would have been achieved.

How do you know he hasn't?

quote:

Originally posted by Blackpudlian:

quote:

What good would saying it to his face be?

Could Siavash be certain he was speaking to the correct face?

quote:

Originally posted by Blackpudlian:

quote:

What good would saying it to his face be?

Could Siavash be certain he was speaking to the correct face?

quote:

Originally posted by little_mrs_bb:
At least Charlie nominated.

But surely he's Marcus's best buddy and he's heart broken that he's been evicted!

That being said, his reasons for nominating Marcus this week ("He's vulgar and nasty") were lies and therefore invalid. Isn't that breaking the rules?

quote:

Originally posted by little_mrs_bb:
At least Charlie nominated.

Just to avoid being up for the public vote, that's why he did it.

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
I think it was a moment of realisation. Something that the other housemates haven't had yet. Namely that Charlie is a two faced little shit.

What good would saying it to his face be? Sure you can call him a wimp for not confronting Charlie but what good would it have done? Everyone else thinks the sun shines out of Charlie's arse so Siavash would find himself in a situation where it's him against the house again but nothing would have been achieved.

Good effort but no cigar. He's spineless and just as calculating as Charlie. He could have won a lot of viewers over by confronting Charlie which he would have done if all that bull he spouts about being true to himself had any merit.

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
I think it was a moment of realisation. Something that the other housemates haven't had yet. Namely that Charlie is a two faced little shit.

What good would saying it to his face be? Sure you can call him a wimp for not confronting Charlie but what good would it have done? Everyone else thinks the sun shines out of Charlie's arse so Siavash would find himself in a situation where it's him against the house again but nothing would have been achieved.

Good effort but no cigar. He's spineless and just as calculating as Charlie. He could have won a lot of viewers over by confronting Charlie which he would have done if all that bull he spouts about being true to himself had any merit.

Give me my cigar!!

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
I think it was a moment of realisation. Something that the other housemates haven't had yet. Namely that Charlie is a two faced little shit.

What good would saying it to his face be? Sure you can call him a wimp for not confronting Charlie but what good would it have done? Everyone else thinks the sun shines out of Charlie's arse so Siavash would find himself in a situation where it's him against the house again but nothing would have been achieved.

Good effort but no cigar. He's spineless and just as calculating as Charlie. He could have won a lot of viewers over by confronting Charlie which he would have done if all that bull he spouts about being true to himself had any merit.

I've heard Siavash say he tries to do what is fair and right...Apart from that I've never noticed him speaking about being true to himself, or really speaking for the sake of it like David. I think Siavash thinks and feels very deeply about what is going on around him, and for a guy of only 23, I find him remarkably level headed and mature.

That's my take on Siavash. I don't condone for one muniute his madness with Noirin, but other than that, I think he's been pretty sound.

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:
Of course he spotted Charlie's hypocrisy in nominating Marcus. So why didn't he say it to his face? How much more of a wimp can this man possibly be? And Charlie was right for the first time in his life. Siavash is doing everything he thinks we want him to do. He's just as desperate to win as Charlie.

I have to agree, I still think Charlie is the worst of all BUT Siavash went on about not nominating (to get everyone up for eviction and give more chance of him being saved) but he played the lowest trick of them all this week by claiming that whoever won should give the money to charity.

I think that is on a par with Charlie's fun and games.

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
I think it was a moment of realisation. Something that the other housemates haven't had yet. Namely that Charlie is a two faced little shit.

What good would saying it to his face be? Sure you can call him a wimp for not confronting Charlie but what good would it have done? Everyone else thinks the sun shines out of Charlie's arse so Siavash would find himself in a situation where it's him against the house again but nothing would have been achieved.

Good effort but no cigar. He's spineless and just as calculating as Charlie. He could have won a lot of viewers over by confronting Charlie which he would have done if all that bull he spouts about being true to himself had any merit.

Give me my cigar!!

No it's bad for your health. Here have some chocolates.

quote:

Originally posted by Senora Reyes:

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
I think it was a moment of realisation. Something that the other housemates haven't had yet. Namely that Charlie is a two faced little shit.

What good would saying it to his face be? Sure you can call him a wimp for not confronting Charlie but what good would it have done? Everyone else thinks the sun shines out of Charlie's arse so Siavash would find himself in a situation where it's him against the house again but nothing would have been achieved.

Good effort but no cigar. He's spineless and just as calculating as Charlie. He could have won a lot of viewers over by confronting Charlie which he would have done if all that bull he spouts about being true to himself had any merit.

I've heard Siavash say he tries to do what is fair and right...Apart from that I've never noticed him speaking about being true to himself, or really speaking for the sake of it like David. I think Siavash thinks and feels very deeply about what is going on around him, and for a guy of only 23, I find him remarkably level headed and mature.

That's my take on Siavash. I don't condone for one muniute his madness with Noirin, but other than that, I think he's been pretty sound.

I don't think he thinks at all except about ways to dodge the public vote which backfired on him God did I laugh at that. I think your desire to get into his pants is clouding your judgement somewhat.

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

I think your desire to get into his pants is clouding your judgement somewhat.

Siavash I find very attractive I will not deny, but to assume I am a fan purely based on this is kinda patronising if so then I guess your desire to be put up a negative thread about Siavash at every turn is driven by your hatred of him.

quote:

Originally posted by Senora Reyes:

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

I think your desire to get into his pants is clouding your judgement somewhat.

Siavash I find very attractive I will not deny, but to assume I am a fan purely based on this is kinda patronising if so then I guess your desire to be put up a negative thread about Siavash at every turn is driven by your hatred of him.

quote:

Originally posted by Senora Reyes:

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

I think your desire to get into his pants is clouding your judgement somewhat.

Siavash I find very attractive I will not deny, but to assume I am a fan purely based on this is kinda patronising if so then I guess your desire to be put up a negative thread about Siavash at every turn is driven by your hatred of him.

I'm shallow. I can't get past the beard.

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

quote:

Originally posted by Senora Reyes:

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:

I think your desire to get into his pants is clouding your judgement somewhat.

Siavash I find very attractive I will not deny, but to assume I am a fan purely based on this is kinda patronising if so then I guess your desire to be put up a negative thread about Siavash at every turn is driven by your hatred of him.

I'm shallow. I can't get past the beard.

quote:

Originally posted by Videostar:

quote:

Originally posted by Nemesis:
Of course he spotted Charlie's hypocrisy in nominating Marcus. So why didn't he say it to his face? How much more of a wimp can this man possibly be? And Charlie was right for the first time in his life. Siavash is doing everything he thinks we want him to do. He's just as desperate to win as Charlie.

I have to agree, I still think Charlie is the worst of all BUT Siavash went on about not nominating (to get everyone up for eviction and give more chance of him being saved) but he played the lowest trick of them all this week by claiming that whoever won should give the money to charity.

I think that is on a par with Charlie's fun and games.

All he said was if they had all agreed that they were not fussed about the money they should give the new money to the charity, what is wrong with that? I missed the high light and the way they lost the the prize money, I am assuming they refused to do a task and BB told them they will lose the prize money and they all agreed that they were in it for the experience and not the money, is that right? If it is then Siavash made a point that if they were not bothered with the £100,000 they could give the new money to Charity. I just can not see how this would make him look good with the public.

quote:

Originally posted by little_mrs_bb:
At least Charlie nominated.

But did more harm than Siavash who didn't nominate.

quote:

Originally posted by cologne1:

quote:

Originally posted by little_mrs_bb:
At least Charlie nominated.

But did more harm than Siavash who didn't nominate.

Yes he nominated his best mate Marcus..when could have nommed David.

quote:

Originally posted by Senora Reyes:

quote:

Originally posted by cologne1:

quote:

Originally posted by little_mrs_bb:
At least Charlie nominated.

But did more harm than Siavash who didn't nominate.

Yes he nominated his best mate Marcus..when could have nommed David.

If he had, David would have been up as well and be gone now and Siavash would have been vindicated for doing what he did.

IMO Siavash does NOT need to confront Charlie (effectively confronting the whole house) about his nomination of Marcus. Siavash knows what he's doing and he made his point in the DR to US the viewers. Just as pretty much Charlie made a complete berk of himself practically crying in the DR over the bloke leaving that he had a million and one reasons to nominate
I think Siavash knows pretty much for sure that he's going be up again should there be another nominations round (they dont know for sure) - it will be interesting - my guess is the Vash versus David (only person not to nom David will be Lisa)

quote:

Originally posted by cologne1:

quote:

Originally posted by Senora Reyes:

quote:

Originally posted by cologne1:

quote:

Originally posted by little_mrs_bb:
At least Charlie nominated.

But did more harm than Siavash who didn't nominate.

Yes he nominated his best mate Marcus..when could have nommed David.

If he had, David would have been up as well and be gone now and Siavash would have been vindicated for doing what he did.

Personally I think it's very wrong of Siavash to critise Charlie about who he nominated.

It is, afterall getting very difficult, as they've said to find reasons to nominate anyone in the house and Charlie had to add to what he said about Marcus because bb said his reasons weren't good enough. As for the point that he could have nominated David instead, well perhaps he gets on with David better. Just because folks out here don't like David as much it doesn't mean to say Charlie shouldn't like him either. I can understand why he chose Marcus and I can understand why he wanted Siavash to go over Marcus.

Can't believe I'm sticking up for Charlie!

Charlie nominates Marcus and then goes into acting overdrive about him going. Stupid berk! Doesn't he realise that we are watching, even though the house won't nominate him?