Skip to main content

Are they trying to fix the final contestants? Why change the last week to vote to evict before vote to save.

If this happens it will most likely save Lisa again from being evicted to make the final, why are they protecting her?

Also this might mean depending who goes on Friday that the survivor might go on Tuesday as more people dislike Siavash/Marcus than say David, or Sophie etc even though they are the current 2 faves.

Which means the final could be Lisa, David, Charlie, Sophie and Roddy. Mad

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
We had our chance to get rid of Lisa, in the week of the vote to save.

We decided to keep her.

We have forfitted the right to complain about her still being in the house, because the week she was supposed to go has been and gone.Smiler


You have to ask, why when that first week she was up that they changed it to a vote to save? When clearly on a vote to evict she was the most disliked housemate.

Blatant Save tactic for her and again this week she would have most likley been out on Tuesday but this time a vote to evict and she and charlie make the final.

She had 2 offical warnings that were never shown, when other housemates (Freddie) get every teeny weenie bit of negative highlights shown.

They never showed her in a argument poke Freddie in the head (which alone she would have been kicked out of for)

They never showed a major argument between her a Freddie were she jumpred out of her bed to within inches of Freddie's face shouting "Shut up Shut up Shut Up"

None of this was shown on highlights that most watch.

Why is she protected.
T

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×