Skip to main content

First I'm assuming block voting is considered not such a good thing for the program, maybe some disagree with me. It's only interesting when the sides are about equal, once that changes it becomes boringly predictable. Big Brother is best when it isn't predictable and when the HMs don't have too much control over who is likely to be go. By allowing nominations to be discussed it's like they have just completely given in to whoever is the dominant group.

I think they could have had better twists to throw more chaos into nominations than they have done. Maybe some tasks used to save some people from going up for instance.

Too many HMs get off lightly, the introduction of new HMs just works to prolong the stay of some relatively boring HMs.

Also they should be more strict on reasons people give for nominations, making sure they are valid and are individual (and not just copying others).

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Free Thinking:
I don't think they should be scrapped, and I think they should show some of every HMs nominations (maybe have a nominations uncut program again).

Another alternative could be make them have to nominate more than two, maybe 4 even. Or to say they cannot nominate a HM so many times, or cannot nominate them twice in a row.



No No No!!!! i hate nomination twists, thats the beauty of the programme. I know it means people like Lisa and Charlie get to stay but thats how it works. I think if there is going to be a twist they should have an everyone up every 4 weeks perhaps, just to weed out a few of the boring ones who never go up.
fifilapew
"Block voting" seems to be this years phrase, i dont know why , its happened every year. Hms become friends and vote out who they dont like, it goes to the public vote and the public decide. i would like next year for BB not to manipulate the nominations, they do the "twists" to suit themselves and what HM they will make most revenue from. Of course they want to make money but they also have a responsibilty to the voting public, which unforunately at times they ignore.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Free Thinking:
Well next year at least.


Maybe they should split HMs into groups more to disrupt groups which have already developed.


I'm not so sure about this. The ability to interact - and gain the trust of fellow housemates, is one of the most fascinating elements of BB. I would like to see less interference from BB - not more...
Cold Sweat

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×