quote:Originally posted by SJ:quote:Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:
Take tonight for an instance. Four of the Lisa gang nominated Siavash and Marcus. In the early part of the show, six people of the Lisa gang used one of their votes to nominate Freddie. One week five of the Lisa gang nominated the same people, one of which was Freddie. What would you call this? Would you call it fair? Would you, more importantly, call it block nominating? If you would, then you must call the game corrupt in its fundamental rules. Thus leading on to Siavash who doesn't agree with the corrupt block nominations and who does not want to become another victim of a corrupt game. So he withdraws from the game.
I would call it a game and when you have to decide who to vote, you pick the perosn who you dislike the most. We saw during the Freddy things that there were huge arguments going on, they voted people who they saw having arguments. Since they were on the other side, ie at the smoking place, they were watching this fromoutside and probably getting a headache from it.
The day that the nominations were allowed, Lisa ranin and said to Sophie who are you viting for? She answered and Lisa said so are we - thats not block voting, thats people being irritated by the same person and having a chance to get rid of them - in the way that the rules state - by voting.
But this is where we would part ways in our opinions SJ. The block nominations emanated from Lisa's opinion of various HMs. She made the balls and the young impressionable HMs fired them for her towards the people she wanted out. Lisa chose the victim every time with her subtle hints on who she didn't like. I don't know what else you would call this system other than block nominating, with Lisa at the helm directing the young, easily influenced HMs to do her bidding. It's so easy to plant seeds in young minds and Lisa knows this.