Stealing from someone's personal space is disgraceful and BB should punish Sophie to show the viewers that they won't tolerate that kind of behaviour.......Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo should be put up for nomination and be taught a lesson
quote:Originally posted by Tequila:
Stealing from someone's personal space is disgraceful and BB should punish Sophie to show the viewers that they won't tolerate that kind of behaviour.......Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo should be put up for nomination and be taught a lesson
What a brilliant idea.quote:Originally posted by Tequila:
Stealing from someone's personal space is disgraceful and BB should punish Sophie to show the viewers that they won't tolerate that kind of behaviour.......Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo should be put up for nomination and be taught a lesson
Yaaayyy! Make it a double eviction midweek, and the other one of them can go on Friday!
quote:Originally posted by Tequila:
Stealing from someone's personal space is disgraceful and BB should punish Sophie to show the viewers that they won't tolerate that kind of behaviour.......Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo should be put up for nomination and be taught a lesson
quote:Originally posted by Tequila:
Stealing from someone's personal space is disgraceful and BB should punish Sophie to show the viewers that they won't tolerate that kind of behaviour.......Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo should be put up for nomination and be taught a lesson
I'll drink to that
quote:Originally posted by Tiddly~Wink:quote:Originally posted by Tequila:
Stealing from someone's personal space is disgraceful and BB should punish Sophie to show the viewers that they won't tolerate that kind of behaviour.......Sophie, Charlie and Rodrigo should be put up for nomination and be taught a lesson
Yaaayyy! Make it a double eviction midweek, and the other one of them can go on Friday!
Absolutely
I would soooo love to see their faces if that announcement was made 
I thought that "BB takse stealing very seriously"
well here we have THEFT from one HM by another HM or HMs,
S, why havent BB stepped in? or is it that they dont think stealing drink is theft? where do they draw the line?
THEFT IS THEFT,
why dont they sit them ALL down and show the whole thing on the plasma?
not only would it be great tv, it would also stir up what has become a very dull BB house (thank god Marcus is still in there I dread to think what it would be like without him)
at the very least both Charlie and Sophie should be given a warning about it, and some sort of punishment, (cant nominate OR automaticaly up for eviction)
and I LOVE the way the NONE IDH supporters try to turn it onto Marcus,
AND "he never stands up the male HMs," he told Siavash in no uncertain terms what he thinks/thought of his actions and also sree,
ah but, Sree doesnt count as a "male" because he is smaller than Marcus??.... so NOW, not only must he find a MALE to fall out with, to prove he isnt a coward or a bully, but it must be a MALE of equal size, or bigger than him!!!
he also told Freddie to "go back to bed" when Freddie was obviously ready for a "ruck" with Charlie and Bea,
OR are we saying that he should LOOK for reasons to fall out with male HMs simply because they are male? and IF HE DID would'nt they then be saying he is a "thug" or a "bully"?
I am certain that if he has a REASON to "argue" with a MALE HM he WILL do so,
"edit" did he or did he NOT argue and get heated with DAVID?? DAVE is a BIG guy easily the same size as Marcus, so come on....where is the "he doesnt stand up to MALE HMs" argument NOW?
well here we have THEFT from one HM by another HM or HMs,
S, why havent BB stepped in? or is it that they dont think stealing drink is theft? where do they draw the line?
THEFT IS THEFT,
why dont they sit them ALL down and show the whole thing on the plasma?
not only would it be great tv, it would also stir up what has become a very dull BB house (thank god Marcus is still in there I dread to think what it would be like without him)
at the very least both Charlie and Sophie should be given a warning about it, and some sort of punishment, (cant nominate OR automaticaly up for eviction)
and I LOVE the way the NONE IDH supporters try to turn it onto Marcus,
AND "he never stands up the male HMs," he told Siavash in no uncertain terms what he thinks/thought of his actions and also sree,
ah but, Sree doesnt count as a "male" because he is smaller than Marcus??.... so NOW, not only must he find a MALE to fall out with, to prove he isnt a coward or a bully, but it must be a MALE of equal size, or bigger than him!!!
he also told Freddie to "go back to bed" when Freddie was obviously ready for a "ruck" with Charlie and Bea,
OR are we saying that he should LOOK for reasons to fall out with male HMs simply because they are male? and IF HE DID would'nt they then be saying he is a "thug" or a "bully"?
I am certain that if he has a REASON to "argue" with a MALE HM he WILL do so,
"edit" did he or did he NOT argue and get heated with DAVID?? DAVE is a BIG guy easily the same size as Marcus, so come on....where is the "he doesnt stand up to MALE HMs" argument NOW?
quote:Originally posted by old hippy guy:
I thought that "BB takse stealing very seriously"
well here we have THEFT from one HM by another HM or HMs,
S, why havent BB stepped in? or is it that they dont think stealing drink is theft? where do they draw the line?
THEFT IS THEFT,
why dont they sit them ALL down and show the whole thing on the plasma?
not only would it be great tv, it would also stir up what has become a very dull BB house (thank god Marcus is still in there I dread to think what it would be like without him)
at the very least both Charlie and Sophie should be given a warning about it, and some sort of punishment, (cant nominate OR automaticaly up for eviction)
and I LOVE the way the NONE IDH supporters try to turn it onto Marcus,
AND "he never stands up the male HMs," he told Siavash in no uncertain terms what he thinks/thought of his actions and also sree,
ah but, Sree doesnt count as a "male" because he is smaller than Marcus??.... so NOW, not only must he find a MALE to fall out with, to prove he isnt a coward or a bully, but it must be a MALE of equal size, or bigger than him!!!
he also told Freddie to "go back to bed" when Freddie was obviously ready for a "ruck" with Charlie and Bea,
OR are we saying that he should LOOK for reasons to fall out with male HMs simply because they are male? and IF HE DID would'nt they then be saying he is a "thug" or a "bully"?
I am certain that if he has a REASON to "argue" with a MALE HM he WILL do so,
"edit" did he or did he NOT argue and get heated with DAVID?? DAVE is a BIG guy easily the same size as Marcus, so come on....where is the "he doesnt stand up to MALE HMs" argument NOW?
Not the first time that you have suggested Sophie should be removed either, is it? You said she should have been ejected for pulling Freddie's shorts down - despite the incident happening at her bedside around 2am in the morning - and Freddie (in fits of laughter) chasing Sophie around and attempting to do the same thing back. At this stage i would much prefer my favourite to win fair and square rather than have the competition removed.
Big Brother provided alcohol for a party - they didn't provide it for Marcus to stash under his bed and use as bait for trades at a later date. I don't agree with the way housemates distribute these non-shopping list gifts from BB. Personally, i think they should be used for the purpose provided - in this case a party. Anything not used by the end of the night should be returned to the host - in this case BB; as a sign of courtesy and respect.
I think Sophie and Charlie should both apologise to Marcus - the less interference from BB the better imo...
quote:Originally posted by Cold Sweat:
Not the first time that you have suggested Sophie should be removed either, is it? You said she should have been ejected for pulling Freddie's shorts down - despite the incident happening at her bedside around 2am in the morning - and Freddie (in fits of laughter) chasing Sophie around and attempting to do the same thing back. At this stage i would much prefer my favourite to win fair and square rather than have the competition removed.
Big Brother provided alcohol for a party - they didn't provide it for Marcus to stash under his bed and use as bait for trades at a later date. I don't agree with the way housemates distribute these non-shopping list gifts from BB. Personally, i think they should be used for the purpose provided - in this case a party. Anything not used by the end of the night should be returned to the host - in this case BB; as a sign of courtesy and respect.
I think Sophie and Charlie should both apologise to Marcus - the less interference from BB the better imo...
WHEN I "suggested" Sophie be removed I was not serious, I was using it as an example of the double standards displayed by some FMs,
because if ALL the reasons you state, fits of laughter etc had been in place and it had been Marcus pulling down a females shorts, this fourm wouldve gone into meltdown and none of the "done in fun" "she was laughing and not upset by it" reasons wouldve been enough,
and YES to be honest, I would prefer it to run its course "naturaly" and Marcus to win in the right way and NOT because his "rivals" had been removed for a rule break, because then we would, no doubt, be forever told that "he only won because so n so had been booted out"
and YES the alcohol WAS provided for ALL the NMs,and it was shared out between the HMs, so, it WAS Marcus,s personal property once it had been given to him, THEY had theirs they drank it, and then took more from Marcus,(theft?)
once the alcohol is given to ALL the HMs by BB they (the HMs) seem to have an "agreement" that it is shared and once shared it then belongs to the person it is given to and no longer "communal" otherwise, why the whispering and the guilt? they KNOW it wasnt theirs, and they KNOW they stole it,
what he chooses to do with it AFTER he has been given it is up to him,
Has Sophie been taking lessons from Bea on transference? She stole from Marcus, but SHE'S not happy with HIM for daring to call her on her thieving ways. Does not compute...does not compute! 
It would "seem" that to some people Marcus is a coward, because he only "picks on females" the fact that he is unaware of Charlies involvment is overlooked, Charlie, on the otherhand DOES know he was involved, but is ok with Sophie (a female) taking all the blame.... now....WHO was it being called a coward again? 
The story in the OP was about Sophie moaning that he was only cross with her.
I thought that meant that Marcus did know that Charlie was involved, but hadn't had a go at him.
Is there more information elsewhere?
I thought that meant that Marcus did know that Charlie was involved, but hadn't had a go at him.
Is there more information elsewhere?
quote:Originally posted by Blizzie:
The story in the OP was about Sophie moaning that he was only cross with her.
I thought that meant that Marcus did know that Charlie was involved, but hadn't had a go at him.
Is there more information elsewhere?
I MAY be wrong (it does happen
) BUT the last I heard was Charlie SAID he was going to tell Marcus, but didnt, I dunno if he has told im since, quote:Originally posted by old hippy guy:quote:Originally posted by Blizzie:
The story in the OP was about Sophie moaning that he was only cross with her.
I thought that meant that Marcus did know that Charlie was involved, but hadn't had a go at him.
Is there more information elsewhere?
I MAY be wrong (it does happen
That was last night.
I presume that Marcus found out today and, going by the story in the OP, that Marcus knows who was involved.
Going by the clip they were in bed this morning when Marcus talked to Sophie about it, he might have talked to Charlie since then, we have no way of knowing either way.
So...the daft immature bimbo with the ridiculous appendages is going to nominate Marcus, because SHE stole HIS booze and he's not happy about it? Fairy nuff!
Why didn't Marcus pull them on it last night? He sat there while they drank it.
as usuall!quote:Originally posted by Cold Sweat:
So Charlie gets away with any involvement in the incident?
I have always been a fan of the plasma screen.
I think big brother should use it more often.
Like last year with the spitting incident, they could have sat all housemates down the next morning and shown them the footage, then asked Dennis to explain his actions along with Rex and Dale. If they explained it sufficiently enough and everyone agreed to let it go then it could have kept Dennis in the house.
But i would have been calling for Kat to be thrown out for her part.
I think big brother should use it more often.
Like last year with the spitting incident, they could have sat all housemates down the next morning and shown them the footage, then asked Dennis to explain his actions along with Rex and Dale. If they explained it sufficiently enough and everyone agreed to let it go then it could have kept Dennis in the house.
But i would have been calling for Kat to be thrown out for her part.
why do they steal? its really bad
