Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by luxor:
The amazing thing is he has a large support. It is beyond me as to why. He is acting in a very child like manner.


All the remaining housemates are shitty. We're hardly spoilt for choices as to who to support.

In my opinion, Siavash is the best of a bad lot. At least he doesn't irritate me with hissy fits, negativity, and tantrums. More or less all the other housemates do.
SpiderMonkey
BB need an advertising campaign for when the show finishes and HM's to promote it, they know that with Vash the slightly different, cool Muslim and Sophie the thick but pretty blonde as their spearhead they will make a mint from it.

C4 are struggling and would love to have these two zeros as a 'look what BB can produce' the market is endless
sinkthepink
quote:
Originally posted by pretty~cocoa~eyes:
I still kind of like him but he has underwhelmed me thus far.... His kindergarten stunts are not helping matters too Disappointed

I wonder BB is too damn lenient this year, Nomination is a fundamental rule and if HMs dont play, boot them the hell out of the house....

These HMs are playing BB big time..


BB undermined the integrity of their own nomination system by abolishing the important nomination chat rule.

I think the entire nomination process has run it's course after 10 years of the same old protocol. Maybe BB are thinking the same. Don't be suprised to see a completely new and different system next year.
SpiderMonkey
quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
quote:
Originally posted by pretty~cocoa~eyes:
I still kind of like him but he has underwhelmed me thus far.... His kindergarten stunts are not helping matters too Disappointed

I wonder BB is too damn lenient this year, Nomination is a fundamental rule and if HMs dont play, boot them the hell out of the house....

These HMs are playing BB big time..


BB undermined the integrity of their own nomination system by abolishing the important nomination chat rule.

I think the entire nomination process has run it's course after 10 years of the same old protocol. Maybe BB are thinking the same. Don't be suprised to see a completely new and different system next year.


I think so to. Nominations are old hat but they should stick to the rules that the contestants signed up for. No nominations equals broken contract equals out on your ear.
Luxor
quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
quote:
Originally posted by pretty~cocoa~eyes:
I still kind of like him but he has underwhelmed me thus far.... His kindergarten stunts are not helping matters too Disappointed

I wonder BB is too damn lenient this year, Nomination is a fundamental rule and if HMs dont play, boot them the hell out of the house....

These HMs are playing BB big time..


BB undermined the integrity of their own nomination system by abolishing the important nomination chat rule.

I think the entire nomination process has run it's course after 10 years of the same old protocol. Maybe BB are thinking the same. Don't be suprised to see a completely new and different system next year.
I agree with you hun... I hope they introduce new rules concerning nominations and evictions for their final show next year....
prettycocoaeyes
quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
quote:
Originally posted by Butter$:
He hasnt a prayer of winning, the thick gobshite.


Previous series have shown that being thick is an advantage if you wish to win. Anthony, Pete, Brian, and Rachel were all dim.


Agreed SM but none of them displayed a thickness coupled to a narcissistic ego.
Butter$
quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
quote:
Originally posted by Butter$:
He hasnt a prayer of winning, the thick gobshite.


Previous series have shown that being thick is an advantage if you wish to win. Anthony, Pete, Brian, and Rachel were all dim.


I wonder if this because people do not like somebody who appears cleverer than them.
Luxor

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×