Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Siavash and sophie do it because they dont get punished everyone esle does

They also do it in the safe knowledge they are going no where

Siavash when he refused put everyone up and was so sorry so sorry he wouldnt do that again,but he did AND why because he knows he never gets punished.

I know it didnt effect dave,but that is not the point

They should have put sophie v siavash and let them squirm an sweat.

If they thought this would happened they would have sung their nominations like two canaries.
C
quote:
Originally posted by Videostar:
quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
Why isn't Sophie being vilified?

Clapping I was about to ask that question.

Now are you wondering about the real motives as to why David is kicking off.?


Yes, he should have just had a go at Bea and left it there. Afterall, sophie and siavash's punishments did not impact on the number of votes David received, where as, had Bea not nominated him, he'd have escaped being nominated this week.
SpiderMonkey
quote:
Originally posted by Marguerita:
I dont blame him for being annoyed and how do we know nothing was said to Sophie depends what they show us in the HL show, Siavash has made it plain he will not vote knowing they get punished not him,he had already told Sophie he did not nominate before she did so the damage had already been done .. simple.


to be fair marguerita sophie chose to not nominate so there for she added to the damage caused by siavash, so she should imo share the blame.
M

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×