Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by Heatseek:
Thanks for the link Muf
Enjoy Heat
mufcdiver.
Nice to see the old programme again muf. Judging with the few things that I've learned since TGGWS was first aired, I can't see why it was considered so scientifically incorrect. Though, perhaps not PC for the time.
Best regards, suricat.
Nice to see the old programme again muf. Judging with the few things that I've learned since TGGWS was first aired, I can't see why it was considered so scientifically incorrect. Though, perhaps not PC for the time.
Best regards, suricat.
Fully concur with you there suricat
In the interest of balance heres a link for any one who wants to watch an inconvenient truth (that should keep St. Gores lawyers off my back )
In the interest of balance heres a link for any one who wants to watch an inconvenient truth (that should keep St. Gores lawyers off my back
)
mufcdiver.
I intended to say that there is no way that I would pay £19.99 for a right to view this proposed data and scenario because six months ago it was absolutely free! However, it's a lot worse than that now! It seems that I can own An Inconvenient Truth for £19.99 without an order of more than £5.00 with Amazon, but if I pay more than £5.00 for an order with Amazon the cost for "An Inconvenient Truth" is only £3.98!
Crap! Because if I pay £19.99 for "An Inconvenient Truth" then I qualify for the discount (which disqualifies me for the discount due to full purchase price)!!!
I think that the relative UK authorities need to address this situation. If I pay more than the discounted price, how can the relevant authority justify the "overcharge" for the lower interactivity that I incurred.
Six months ago I could have given a link that gave full access to the data that you refer to. However, it seems that "An Inconvenient Truth" is now subject to the capitalistic pressure of "pay per view" (bye bye Gore)!
I expected to find a "free access link" muf, but I've failed in this travail so I'll just sign off in disgust of myself.
Best regards, suricat.
quote:
In the interest of balance heres a link for any one who wants to watch an inconvenient truth
I intended to say that there is no way that I would pay £19.99 for a right to view this proposed data and scenario because six months ago it was absolutely free! However, it's a lot worse than that now! It seems that I can own An Inconvenient Truth for £19.99 without an order of more than £5.00 with Amazon, but if I pay more than £5.00 for an order with Amazon the cost for "An Inconvenient Truth" is only £3.98!
Crap! Because if I pay £19.99 for "An Inconvenient Truth" then I qualify for the discount (which disqualifies me for the discount due to full purchase price)!!!
I think that the relative UK authorities need to address this situation. If I pay more than the discounted price, how can the relevant authority justify the "overcharge" for the lower interactivity that I incurred.
Six months ago I could have given a link that gave full access to the data that you refer to. However, it seems that "An Inconvenient Truth" is now subject to the capitalistic pressure of "pay per view" (bye bye Gore)!
I expected to find a "free access link" muf, but I've failed in this travail so I'll just sign off in disgust of myself.
Best regards, suricat.
quote:Six months ago I could have given a link that gave full access to the data that you refer to. However, it seems that "An Inconvenient Truth" is now subject to the capitalistic pressure of "pay per view" (bye bye Gore)!
Its all a money making exercise suricat