Skip to main content

Reply to "More Empirical falsifications of Anthropic Global Warming"

muf.

Yes, just like SoM suggested way back! However, the most abundant aerosol, water condensate, may well override other aerosols if Dr. Roy Spencer’s paper survives.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/04/a-response-to-kevin-trenberth/

As you can see, he describes how cloud tops reflect the SW insolation (doesn’t do much for UV and blue vis though) and reduces the warming energy effect of insolation, but I think he should’ve gone to greater depth with cloud evolution (like how energy not reflected adds to produce a ‘thunderhead’ when enough water is available). OK. So perhaps the ‘thunderhead’ explanation should be the responsibility of Dr. Lindzen to describe?

Seriously, if Roy’s observations stand, the Earth’s sensitivity to a changing climate is really very small. This means that the IPCC’s estimation is way out!

Is this an ‘empirical falsification’, or what?

Best regards, Ray Dart (AKA, suricat).

S
×
×
×
×
×