Skip to main content

Reply to "More Empirical falsifications of Anthropic Global Warming"

Suricat
quote:
Sorry, but this does not compute. A comparison of temps/warming between particular dates needs a correlation of relevant points within cycles as well.

I would normally use the European Centre, SIDC, for data ref, but their site has had broken links for a long time now. So I'll use "climate4you". Not so prestigious, but it's good and it's there.
http://www.climate4you.com/
Now click "Sun" in the L/H sidebar, then click "Solar irradiance and sunspot number" as your page menu choice.


Thanks for the Climate4you ref (a treasure trove). I'd somehow missed this site despite all the AGW related reading and googling that I do. I agree totally your point about working between similar points in the cycle. 5 years hence will be an interesting time in how these graphs evolve. Hopefully there will be greater clarity on what causes the drift between the satellite record and the terrestrial record.
SO
×
×
×
×
×