quote:I was of the understanding that this thread is a continuation of the 'Is there an empirical falsification of anthropogenic CO2' thread from C4 (though to be fair, this should be defined by SoM as it's his thread).
Indeed that was precisely my intention....in the absence of M Batchelor who owned the original thread.
The emphasis being on empirical because how else could it be falsified? And also a reminder that by anthropic global warming we are talking about 'dangerous warming'.
And by dangerous I mean that the world will be in a significantly worse state than without any warming.