quote:Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:quote:Originally posted by Lord Lucan:quote:Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:
If Siavash had not opened up the competition by his non-voting, we could expect a very boring final few weeks. As it is, he has broken the predictability of Lisa's power base and the competition has been thrown wide open to fair play. By doing what he done, Siavash has taken the risk of (a) being ejected from the show for non-nomination or (b) being a possible evictee if they all go up. In my book, that is taking risks with winning the money, being heavily nominated nearer the final, and being greatly disliked by his fellow HMs. Obviously, Siavash thought the risks were worth taking, and he has the courage of his convictions with regard to a level playing field.
How is it fair play? Siavash is trying to a) stop him and Marcus going head to head because I bet you a zillion dollars he thought Marcus would've gone last week, not Freddie. If he goes up against Marcus he might lose and b) he knows he has a better chance of surviving if the whole House is up. So far he has got away with it but at what cost? At the cost of other HMs who have done nothing wrong (Hira) and who haven't been PROPERLY nominated for eviction either which isn't fair is it??? No wonder Rodrigo had a go at him for playing "God".
Siavash is an utter coward and instead of following the rules and facing the consequences of going which EVERYONE before him has done, he is changing them left, right and centre to stop himself from going up against someone popular. He is actually up his own @rse and getting wayyyyyy too cocky about this, something the public cannot stand. Look what happened to Freddie!
hi LordL. Fair play, as I understand it, is the system whereby everyone is given an equal chance to succeed. When that option is taken away, it only takes one person to change the system by not complying with the rules of the game and exposing the game as corrupt. Had Siavash nominated in the normal way this week, the same thing would have happened as had happened the week before, ie one of the outside gang would go. This is how the end of the show would have panned out, Lisa-style. Thankfully Siavash has outed the real cheaters, the ones who want to win by any means, the ones who would have accepted the corrupt block nominations to survive. At least concede that the system was corrupt and rotten. Liking Siavash for exposing cheating in a game is commendable imo. For agreeing to a corrupt system in a game is akin to agreeing that fair play and a level playing field are alien to society as a whole. The public may disagree with the latter concept, and applaud someone who has the nous to break the corruption.
Hi Twee, I see it that last week he wanted to "play the game" and nominated as per usual yet 2 weeks before he didn't? When the whole House was up because of it (including him), he almost had heart failure when Davina said his name (to say he was saved which he didn't know). I just can't stand the way he then went sorry, sorry guys when he knew he was safe.
I'm sure he voted Bea last week anyway so he is a hypocrite.